Comment on Self hosted Teams alternative?
nixxo@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
I use jami but i dont think it fits your need for guess links.
Still leave it here just in case
Jami is a free/libre, end-to-end encrypted, and private communication software.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 weeks ago
Jami is a stability and security nightmare
I wouldn’t recommend it
callcc@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Please tell us more about the actual security problems!
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
Have you actually dug into the internals? It is pretty bad. Large poorly maintained code base with poor cryptography. Theoretically it is fine but I’d rather use Signal.
callcc@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
No, I rarely read the code of software I use, especially crypto code since thant’s not my thing. But good to know that you did. Thanks for your opinion.
lemonuri@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
It’s true there are a lot of better alternatives to jami when it comes to privacy/security: Here’s a good comparison in a table:
www.messenger-matrix.de/messenger-matrix-en.html
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 weeks ago
Care to expand on that? I am seriously considering that as part of my post-skype future.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
I would look into Jami, Signal and maybe Simplex Chat
nixxo@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Im using it for 3 months now and I did not notice any stability issue. One time I experienced a long delay in receiving a message.
Do you have any details on why its a security nightmare?
All communications are peer-to-peer and end-to-end encrypted.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
It is a massive code base which doesn’t seem to get a lot of maintenance due to lack of developers. Jami also lacks a security audit which doesn’t build confidence
From a security perspective it uses dTLS which isn’t great for metadata sensitive applications. Message delivery is also finicky since it depends on peers working reliably.