Found the landlord! /s
Comment on Owners of second homes in Wales are having to sell up. That’s no disaster: it’s a godsend
BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 1 day ago
Allow one primary house, and a second one, tax the rest to fucking oblivion if not sold within a reasonable time frame
Nanook@lemm.ee 1 day ago
BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 1 day ago
I wish I owned my home but unfortunately, I don’t have rich parents :(
echodot@feddit.uk 16 hours ago
But you’re prepared to allow people to have a second home when you realise that most people can’t even afford the first. That’s generous I don’t think I’d be that generous.
9point6@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Why should someone be allowed a 2nd home without penalty in a country with housing scarcity?
I’d say at least a 50% value tax on that as unnecessary consumption
BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 1 day ago
Because it’s not unreasonable to have a primary home and maybe a vacation home, or a family home, or a rental. More than that is absurd.
The scarcity would decrease pretty fast, coupled with a situation where private companies can’t own houses and apartments, that would pretty much solve it
9point6@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
Of course it’s not unreasonable, but if you want that luxury, you should pay from taking that supply from someone who needs it
cristian64@reddthat.com 21 hours ago
It’s not unreasonable, but if after taxing 3rd and 4th homes (etc.) to oblivion the issue persists, then also second homes should be taxed high. I truly believe that extreme would not be needed once it’s made humanely forbidden to own multiple homes without intention of ever living in them.
Worth adding that it should not be the number of homes what should be taxed, but based on the market value of those properties.
bdonvr@thelemmy.club 1 day ago
I mean we should start high on the second home and go way up from there IMO
BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 1 day ago
Yeah that would make sense
the_q@lemm.ee 1 day ago
Yes it is unreasonable.