Comment on In a few years, new smartphones will be as big and heavy as the first cell phones.

• pishadoot@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  “I saw it on YouTube and therefore it must be true, not basic economics”

  source
• cattywampas@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  It is true. Women’s pants with big pockets are freely available, just do a Google shopping search and you’ll see. American Eagle, Gap, Abercrombie, Forever 21, Old Navy, H&M, Ann Taylor, Dickies, Patagonia, Levi’s, and the list goes on. All these retailers sell baggy and loose pants with big pockets.

  Also worth noting, Y2K fashion is very in with younger people and you’ll see them wearing a lot of baggy pants, I’m talking JNCO baggy.

  So why aren’t big-pocketed pants the standard in women’s fashion? It’s simple: women tend to want slimmer pants. It’s just a consumer decision.

  source

  • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Some women want the slimmer pants, yet all the options with pockets are baggy. Yes you need some space for a pocket, but that doesn’t mean the entire entire pant needs to be baggy.

    Men’s slim jeans are available with pockets able to accommodate a larger phone with out issue.

    source