Comment on Tesla bait-and-switch: Cybertruck owners won't get Autosteer feature they paid for
CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day agoI don’t think they can, because they’re suffering so much from the rectal-cranial inversion that Musk started with his FSD.
Muskrat insists on using computer vision entirely, and building it in-house. Tesla (probably EM) as I recall also insulted MobilEye so they refuse to do business with them. Mind you, I think lane keeping is generally a computer vision problem.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 day ago
FSD has lane-keeping in it. It’s not up for debate if they can do it or not, because they’ve been doing it for years.
Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 1 day ago
Both. You can use both LiDAR and optical teaming, the technologies complement each other so you don’t fall for a Looney-Tunes ass painted wall, while the camera covers the one-dimensional recognition that LiDAR can’t.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 10 hours ago
Lidar does not help with seeing lane markers. At all. Radar can’t see painted lines on a road.
That looney tunes wall “test” was ridiculous and Rober was rightly raked over the coals and lost a lot of respect over it. It was basically a marketing stunt by his friends LiDAR company, and was full of dishonesty such as poorly photoshopped phones and lies such as not even using the self driving while smashing into the wall. These glaring flaws have been covered extensively.
Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 8 hours ago
Honestly, while not a scientifically rigerous test, it does demonstrate through absurdity the real risks of computer vision only for driver assist features.
Real world examples including of course the Tesla that plowed into a white truck on a foggy day because it mistook the truck for absolutely nothing among too many others