[deleted]
Comment on After they kill Wikipedia history will be AI hallucinations.
_cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day agoNormally I would just mock you by pointing out that liberals stay in the tweets while leftists get out on the streets, but you’re obviously suffering from mental illness and I don’t think it’s very nice to make fun of people who are clearly having a mental breakdown, judging by your totally normal reaction.
As for BRICS, IDK why you even brought that up, but two of the biggest members are having active border clashes with each other, a third has depleted their conventional army due to their strategic genius in Ukraine, and two others want to fuck off and have nothing to do with any of the rest. But sure, instead of accepting that Trump is a symptom of the inherently flawed system WE built here in the United States, let’s just blame the most dysfunctional Wish.com EU knock-off trade partnership in the world cause that’s easier and we get to pretend our own shit doesn’t stink.
Also, hey @antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com, turns out it’s uh checks notes BRICS that’s censoring Wikipedia to convince you not to drink your own pee.
Yup, bunch of totally normal people in these comments.
LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 1 day ago
_cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Yeah, there’s no point in engaging with anything you just wrote, because you’re very clearly dedicated to whatever this wonderful and deep narrative is that you’ve crafted. But I will point out one thing you said that’s so very obviously wrong.
All of your ad hominems
I didn’t make any ad hominems. You see, almost every person who has ever cried that in an argument has had no idea what an ad hominem actually is. If I say “you’re wrong because you’re an Argonian, and you can’t be trusted”, that would be typical Imperial racism and also an ad hominem. But if I say “you’re wrong, because your arguments suck. and also, argonians have stinky fish breath”, that would be classical Imperial racism, but would not be an ad hominem. An ad hominem is an attempt to refute an argument by using a personal attack. It is not, as is commonly believed by internet keyboard warriors the world around, merely a personal attack.
Oh, and if you’re going to call someone a nazi, at least make it someone the average person would believe is a nazi. If I was anything of the sort, I personally know three admins of my instance who would not hesitate to ban me in an instant, and one or two of them could probably dox me if they wanted to.
LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Normally I would just mock you by pointing out that liberals stay in the tweets while leftists get out on the streets, but you’re obviously suffering from mental illness
Here’s an ad hominem and ableism. Your refusal to debate the argument here is a fallacy and bad faith.
and I don’t think it’s very nice to make fun of people who are clearly having a mental breakdown, judging by your totally normal reaction.
2nd instance of ad hom and ableism in this comment alone.
As for BRICS,
Thanks for reminding me you failed to answer any questions and lost this devate completely.
Also, hey @antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com, turns out it’s uh checks notes BRICS that’s censoring Wikipedia to convince you not to drink your own pee.
Strawman, that was never said. I also have a longform comment to that user already explaining why the science of the pee drinking stuff is bogus, so somehow you did a double strawman.
Yup, bunch of totally normal people in these comments.
3rd instance of ad hom and ableism
Now for this comment.
you’re very clearly dedicated to whatever this wonderful and deep narrative is that you’ve crafted
That’s literally just having integrity and debating a position. You can’t argue because you don’t know how to argue this topic in good faith and apparently too childish to admit it.
and also, argonians have stinky fish breath
This is an ad hom, and further, you are basing the entirety of your refusal to discuss in good faith on ad homs in the previous comment.
you’re wrong, because your arguments suck
This is also a fallacy and bad faith argument, it would be dismissed. Circular reasoning.
An ad hominem is an attempt to refute an argument by using a personal attack
That’s what you did. Literally.
Oh, and if you’re going to call someone a nazi, at least make it someone the average person would believe is a nazi
You are one or you support them which makes you one.
If I was anything of the sort, I personally know three admins of my instance who would not hesitate to ban me in an instant, and one or two of them could probably dox me if they wanted to.
Really bad application of appeal to authority - fallacy. Lemmy mods dont determine who is a Nazi lol
_cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
In order to “argue in good faith”, you have to be conversing with someone who has the capacity to critically consider their own viewpoints and change them when presented with evidence that’s contrary to them. And let’s be honest here, that ain’t you.
But hey, if you think I’m a nazi, then I encourage you to report me. Because I’m pretty sure being a nazi is against the rules of both this community, and my own instance, so if you feel so strongly about it, you should do your Lemmy civic duty and bring it to the attention of the mods and admins.
antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
I think you misunderstood. The terminally ill cancer patient is getting urine salts from cancer free individuals. Nowhere on Wikipedia did anybody claim a benefit from the drinking of one’s own urine. Leave that to the alchemists.