Comment on After they kill Wikipedia history will be AI hallucinations.
_cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 weeks agoIn order to “argue in good faith”, you have to be conversing with someone who has the capacity to critically consider their own viewpoints and change them when presented with evidence that’s contrary to them. And let’s be honest here, that ain’t you.
But hey, if you think I’m a nazi, then I encourage you to report me. Because I’m pretty sure being a nazi is against the rules of both this community, and my own instance, so if you feel so strongly about it, you should do your Lemmy civic duty and bring it to the attention of the mods and admins.
LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Lol, I don’t cause you to argue in bad faith (with entire comments full of fallacies), that’s you who does so of your own brainpower.
You’ve not once made a valid counterargument or even provided evidence. What evidence? The only content I’ve seen is your ableism and ad hominems. Can you actually form an independent, good faith argument backed with valid evidence? I haven’t seen evidence of THAT being able to happen yet.
_cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 weeks ago
I don’t need to provide any evidence? You’re the one making claims, the burden of proof is on you. Nobody has to do any work to disprove claims YOU’RE making.
also, your fallacy is the fallacy fallacy. yourlogicalfallacyis.com/the-fallacy-fallacy
LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Yes, you do need to provide evidence for your claims. I’ve provided evidence and explained my position, and your position has been fallacies and ad homs. That’s not a valid refutation. That you need this explained to you is … Lol
That’s not how fallacies work lol. You have to specifically outline what part of speech is using fallacious arguments. It’s not “my” fallacy lol
That’s also not how the fallacy fallacy works in argument, because it 1) shows you admit you have argued in bad faith and 2) goes back to arguing in good faith because that is what is considered reasonable, that is, able to be reasoned with, and not nonsense.
Again, that you need this explained to you is lol
May you end up in court some day, please 🙏
_cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 weeks ago
No, I don’t, because I didn’t make any claims. I don’t need to disprove your conspiracy any more than I need to disprove that some god or another doesn’t exist. Don’t be so fucking lazy, if you want people to think you’re anything more than some idiot on the internet, prove your own theories.
You came back a week later to once again spout barely legible nonsense, probably thinking yourself particularly clever. A notion that is disabused by your seeming inability to understand even the arguments you’re making, let alone those of others.
This is Lemmy. Nobody has to engage with you in good faith, nobody has to humor your demands. Nobody has to listen attentively while you spout conspiracy theories. And if you seriously think I “lose” anything by not agreeing with you simply because you desire me to, then it does nothing other than show how lonely and unfulfilling your life is. Until you responded, I had forgotten you even existed. A week from now, I will have forgotten again. You’re simply not relevant in any way to me.
Now do us both a favor, and go away. Feeling pity for you is making me sad.