Spoilers for the plot of the movie. If you have to ask you haven’t seen it.
Would explaining go into spoilers? Or is this “thing” in relation to the staff that worked on it?
NineSwords@ani.social 1 month ago
DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Understood. No more needs to be said. 😁
Unboxious@ani.social 1 month ago
I’ve seen it and I have no clue what “the thing” is here either. Maybe they’re referring to the fact the story is about as happy as you’d expect from the person who wrote it.
ReluctantZen@feddit.nl 1 month ago
Yeah I’m not sure what they mean either
NineSwords@ani.social 1 month ago
Okay, I’ll bite. If you have seen the movie and someone says to you “I don’t like it because of the thing that happens in it” you’re telling me you have no idea what they mean? No idea whatsoever? And the best answer you can come up with is “because it’s not happy”?
Unboxious@ani.social 1 month ago
Yes.
NineSwords@ani.social 1 month ago
Not gonna lie. Seems like a bad faith take to me.
But okay, let’s elaborate. :) Wouldn’t you agree that there is a singular event in the movie that stands out both tonally and narratively. A event that most movie watchers would find surprising, shocking even, and might take offense with? I mean I’m sure there are some cinematically literate geniuses that read all the minute foreshadowing and then felt elated when their predictions came through, or some psychos that really get their kinks in that type of content, but “generally” speaking.