Comment on Mastodon is Rewinding the Clock on Social Media — in a Good Way

d00phy@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• TheProtagonist@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I really don’t think that Mastodon needs influencers. It’s just normal people talking about normal stuff. Don’t need any “I‘m so glorious, and here’s my product that will make you think you’re glorious, too” kind of influencers there, thanks!

  source

  • sheogorath@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    This, very much this. I’ve been having more pleasant discussions with random people replying to Mastodon posts compared to the brain parasites victim making their nest on xitter.

    source
  • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    “Influencer” is just a word to describe a phenomenon that will naturally arise on any platform where following someone doesn’t require a follow back: some people will have a lot of followers, for whatever reason. They’ve existed as authors and columnists, radio personalities, television and film celebrities, podcast hosts, etc.

    Some grow followers organically on the specific platform, while others bring their followers on from being independently famous outside the platform. And it doesn’t matter if they don’t start off as famous - all it takes is for a post or comment to go viral and then the attention is there, whether the creator wanted it or not.

    source
• MargotRobbie@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I mean, you guys are stuck with me as your only real celebrity for a while… (and the Debian logo design person.)

  source

  • Ilgaz@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I remember back in 2000s 2 or 3 guys were so misinformed that Bruce Wills himself joined the comments and explained the movie industry doesn’t work that way. Of course they didn’t believe it was him and they ended up being video called by him to “prove” it is really him. I will find that page one day. In the 90s it was common that a famous actor/producer discuss ongoing things with the fans.

    source
• thecodemonk@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Please, just no. Keep those scum influencers away. It would immediately ruin the platform.

  source
• jayandp@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Xitter

  LOL, my brain read that as “shitter” and I found that pretty fitting.

  source
• infyrin@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  And I’m strangely okay with this.

  If the idiots of the masses are going to follow individual idiots on one platform. Keep them there. Things like Mastodon and the concept of the fediverse is just too much for their little one-dimensional brains to handle.

  source
• sj_zero ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Here's an alternative question: Do we really want the fediverse to take off like big tech did?

  I sort of like that this little corner of the Internet isn't filled with a bunch of megacorporations and political bot farms trying to fiddle with our opinions to their benefit. Once it gets too big, it's going to lose something really important. Also, I fear that it could become impossible for a little operator to run an instance anymore.

  • d00phy@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Solid point. Kind of goes back to what we want out of our social media. If we want to follow the celebrities we like, we’re probably stuck with Xitter & other data harvesters (outside of the enlightened folks like Mr. Fry). I honestly use Mastodon slightly more than I use(ed) Twitter. Barely more than not at all.

    source
• Invertedouroboros@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  There’s a part of me that legitimately wonders how far Twitter could go as an influncer bubble. Granted this is unlikely to happen but if everyone who’s not an influencer just left for Mastodon and Twitter just became a hollow shell of influencers trying to sell products to customers who just aren’t there, how far would Twitter’s inerta carry it before anyone realized?

  source
• CAVOK@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Jeri Ryan is on mastodon. I’m ok with that too.

  source
• MalachaiConstant@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Stephen Fry is there? Well shit, guess I have a reason to check it out after all.

  source