Yeah, odd choice. The Guardian is one of the few remaining outlets with actual credible integrity
Comment on Media discovers a unique Russian culture of impunity
protist@mander.xyz 5 days ago
The Guardian’s always been pretty on point. As far as awful media sources go, I don’t know why you’d select one that’s relatively decent
lemon@sh.itjust.works 5 days ago
Laser@feddit.org 5 days ago
I never got the sentiment either. in fact I always found it to be among the best outlets. I’m a subscriber and I don’t even live in an English speaking country, and this is my only news subscription - didn’t find one that’s better overall yet.
IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 3 days ago
I am so disappointed that TheGuardian threw away their entire reputation to manufacture consent for genocide and nobody even remembers it.
Now I understand how they keep doing it after 9/11. Nobody even remembers the mass propagande campaigns when they happened.
IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 5 days ago
TheGuardian is a stalwart defender of . They went as far as claiming they verified video evidence of rape on october 7
Image
Israel has this year admitted that no photo or video evidence of rape on october 7 exists.
TheGuardian is horribly unreliable and their double standards are palpable. For more info here is a great source dismantling their propaganda
protist@mander.xyz 5 days ago
I totally get having beef with a specific article, but the Guardian is more than one article my dude.
The language being used to describe Palestinians is genocidal
The Guardian view on Gazan genocide charges: Israel finds itself with a plausible case to answer
Israel’s leaders committed genocide in Gaza and must pay for it. Their political and media allies must too
IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 4 days ago
So TheGuardian a stalwart proponent of the genocide is slowly walking back their initial rhetoric of manufacturing consent for genocide. This is what all mainstream newspapers did after the Iraq invasion. First they publish the lies. Then when the destruction is done they publish a small footnote saying it was not very nice. Even NYT is publishing a few critical articles. It changes nothing.
Instead of lying about having seen non existent evidence, it dares not name Israel committing a genocide as genocide even in an opinion piece. Utterly pathetic.
If you can find articles from TheGuardian saying there is no evidence that Hamas committed rape on october 7 you will convince me. But knowing them that lie is staying up for a few years after genocide is over. Even now they have not published a correction.
protist@mander.xyz 4 days ago
WTF dude, check the dates