Comment on Are there any Lemmy/Mbin instances by women for women?

• Taleya@aussie.zone ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  now you’re just being dickish.

  source

  • barsoap@lemm.ee ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Nah I’m demanding clarity. A clear question “Do you mean excluding TERFs or excluding women” and the answer is “I want to be inclusive”. It may not be meant as such, but that’s exactly how a TERF would evade questioning.

    A clear “Fuck TERFs” would have provided plenty of clarity, and been much shorter. Also, it would have said “Fuck TERFs”.

    source

    • LwL@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Idk man “exclusionary” is literally part of terf I don’t think there’s much ambiguity there. Fuck terfs though.

      source

      • StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        This is transmisogynistic and misogynoir as well as plain old misogyny. Don’t ask me to explain. Just don’t do it.

        source
      • barsoap@lemm.ee ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        They’re also complaining about “women being excluded from women’s spaces by agents of the patriarchy posing as women”. They’re also not necessarily using “TERF” as a label. They’re using typical fascist-style “words mean whatever we want them to mean in the moment” type of stuff, hiding clear-cut positions behind pretend nuance, hence why I favour clarity.

        source
    • Taleya@aussie.zone ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      I regret my part in this recto-cranial inversion of a conversation

      source