It’s okay, Let’s Encrypt only provides SSL certs for… 63.7% of the market?
Okay okay, that is a lot. But what does a CA need funding for anyway? It doesn’t take much bandwidth to send out new certs.
The only thing that could be expensive is if they had to rapidly invalidate thousands of certs to protect the security of the entire internet.
But haha, that’s a pretty outlandish scenario that would never happen.
renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 1 week ago
Let’s Encrypt has done so much for encouraging the spread of HTTPS and good certificate practices. If they went away, I honestly think a good chunk of the internet would start breaking after ~6 months.
gray@pawb.social 1 week ago
Less HTTPS = easier government & advertiser data collection
ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I’m pretty sure browsers don’t even load http sites anymore.
AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 week ago
When I spin up a new self hosted service it’s easier to add caddy to the stack than to convince Firefox to load http.
cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 1 week ago
HTTP works fine in Firefox unless you set it to HTTPS only. Even then, you only have to click off a warning to open an HTTP site.
StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org 1 week ago
They load. I have to specify http:// to get it to work though.
gray@pawb.social 1 week ago
I’m sure google will fix that in chrome, like killing adblocker functionality.
dan@upvote.au 1 week ago
At least there’s some competitors now, which could be used as drop-in replacements if Let’s Encrypt were to disappear.