Comment on Most Americans think AI won’t improve their lives, survey says

carrion0409@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

• doodledup@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Replacing people is a good thing. It means less people do more work. It means progress. It means products and services will get cheaper and more available.

  source

  • stardust@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Great for people getting fired or finding that now the jobs they used to have that were middle class are now lower class pay or obsolete. They will be so delighted at the progress despite their salaries and employment benefits and opportunities falling.

    And it’s so nice that AI is most concentrated in the hands of billionaires who are oh so generous with improving living standards of the commoners. Wonderful.

    source

    • doodledup@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      This is collateral damage of societal progress. This is a phenomenon as old as humanity. You can’t fight it. And it has brought us to where we are now. From cavemen to space explorers.

      source

      • mriormro@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Oh hey, it’s the Nazi apologist. Big shock you don’t give a fuck about other people’s lives.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • stardust@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Which are separate things from whether peoples ability to financially support themselves.

        People can have smartphones and tech the past didn’t have, but be increasingly worse off financially and unable to afford housing.

        And you aren’t a space explorer.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • mriormro@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Whoever the mod was that decided to delete my comment is a fool. This guy above is a Nazi apologist.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • futatorius@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Yeah, yeah, omelettes…eggs… heard it all before.

        source
    • doodledup@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Great for people getting fired or finding that now the jobs they used to have that were middle class are now lower class pay or obsolete. They will be so delighted at the progress despite their salaries and employment benefits and opportunities falling.

      This shouldn’t come as a surprise. Everyone who’s suprised by that is either not educated how economy works or how societal progress works. There are always winners and losers but society makes net-positive progress as a whole.

      I have no empathy for people losing their jobs. Even if I lose my job, I accept it. It’s just life. Humanity is a really big machine of many gears. Some gears replace others to make the machine run more efficient.

      And it’s so nice that AI is most concentrated in the hands of billionaires who are oh so generous with improving living standards of the commoners. Wonderful.

      This is just a sad excuse I’m hearing all the time. The moment society gets intense and chang is about to happen, a purpetrator needs to be found. But most people don’t realize that the people at the top change all the time when the economy changes. They die aswell. It’s a dynamic system. And there is no one purpetrator in a dynamic system. The only purpetrator is progress. And progress is like entropy. It always find its way and you cannot stop it. Those who attempt to stop it instead of adapting to it will be crushed.

      source

      • demonsword@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        I have no empathy for people losing their jobs

        FTFY

        source
  • OnASnowyEvening@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I trust you’ve volunteered for it to replace you then. It being so beneficial to society, and all.

    It means less people do more work.

    And then those people no longer working… do what, exactly? Fewer well-paying jobs, same number of people, increasing costs. Math not working out here.

    The fact that people are being replaced means that AI actually has tremendous value for our society.

    Oh, it has value. Just not for society (it could that’s the sad part). For very specific people though, yeah, value. Just got to step on all the little people along the way, like we’ve always done, eh?

    Yeah, rather than volunteering its more likely you lack a basic characteristic of humanity some of like to refer to as “empathy” instead. And if – giving you the benefit of the doubt – you’re just a troll… well, my statement stands.

    source

    • doodledup@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I trust you’ve volunteered for it to replace you then. It being so beneficial to society, and all.

      Yes. If I get replaced by something more efficient I accept that. I am no longer worth the position of my job. I will look for something else and try to find ways to apply some of my skillsets in other ways. I may do some further training and education, or just accept a lower paying job if that’s not possible.

      And then those people no longer working… do what, exactly? Fewer well-paying jobs, same number of people, increasing costs. Math not working out here.

      Can you elaborate? I don’t quiet understand what you mean by that. The people who no longer work need to find something else. There will remain only a fraction that can never find another job again. And that fraction is offset by the increased productivity of society.

      Oh, it has value. Just not for society (it could that’s the sad part). For very specific people though, yeah, value. Just got to step on all the little people along the way, like we’ve always done, eh?

      Can you specify “specific”? What little people? If you use very vague terminology like that you should back it up with some arguments. I personally see no reason why AI would disadvantage working people any more than the sewing machine did back in the day.

      I have a feeling you’re not actually thinking this through, or at least doing it on a very emotional level. This will not help you adapt to the changing world. The very opposite actually.

      source
  • MangoCats@feddit.it ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Replacing people is a good thing.

    Yes, and no: npr.org/…/why-economists-got-free-trade-with-chin…

    source