no reason to believe it violates “democratic values”
In my country the law is one of the pillars of democracy, but you do you 👍
pennomi@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
OpenAI picked Studio Ghibli because Miyazaki hates their approach.
I highly doubt it. They picked it because the Ghibli style is very popular among users. There’s also no reason to believe that it violates “democratic values”. Since it’s popular, the general population is voting that they LIKE it, not that they oppose it.
Downvote me all you like, but this is trying to put a lot of malice where the simpler explanation is just “money”.
Bogasse@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
pennomi@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
The law very, BERY often violates the democratic choices of the people in the United States. That’s what you get when you do FPTP voting schemes.
FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
You’re implying that this is against the law without ever bothering to prove the implication.
balder1991@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Yeah the text makes many freestyle assumptions, although the overall sentiment is correct that these big companies and especially egocentric billionaires do stuff to trigger others simply for power display. I believe the text linked about it being a distraction for the new round of funding is the real reason.
Peanutbjelly@sopuli.xyz 4 weeks ago
It’s the “you stole my style” artists attacking artists all over again. And digital art isn’t real att/cameras are evil/cgi isn’t real art all over with a more organic and intelligent medium.
The issue is the same as it has always been. Anything and everything is funneled to the rich and the poor blame the poor who use technology, because anthropocentric bias makes it easier to vilify than the assholes building our cage around us.
The apple “ecosystem” has done much more damage than AI artists, but people can’t seem to comprehend how. Also Disney and corpos broke copyright so that its just a way for the rich to own words and names and concepts, so that the poor can’t use them to get ahead.
All art is a remix. Disney only became successful using other artists hard work in the Commons. Now the Commons is a century more out of grasp, so only the rich can own the artists and hoard the growth of art.
Also which artists actually have the time and money to litigate? I guess copyright does help some nepo artists.
Nepotism is the main way to earn your right to invest into becoming an artist that isn’t fatiguing towards collapse of life.
But let’s keep yelling at the technology for being evil.
Ilixtze@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
yeah yeah you ai bros keep crying about how useless artists are but you keep gobbling up datasets full of them! Hypocrites everyone of you! You need them! You crave them to spit more and more useless derivative trash.
pennomi@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Try comprehending what he wrote instead of spewing insults, it might make you smarter. He’s clearly not an AI bro.
morphballganon@mtgzone.com 4 weeks ago
Money and malice are not a dichotomy. I would say most malice is for monetary reasons.
pennomi@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Of course they aren’t, but also the cartoonish levels of moustache-twirling villainy described here are unlikely to be real.
They thought it was cool. They knew it would drive usage and make money. They shit on intellectual property. There is no other explanation needed, nor is it sensible.
474D@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Yeah it’s not like this is the only way to generate the style, it’s relatively simple to even do it locally