Playing devil’s advocate, chainsaws are used for cutting trees and other tasks, they are not inherently a weapon unlike a sword (these are similar arguments to the ones used about gun control). I do find it silly to ban weeb swords, but mostly because I don’t think they’re ever really used for crimes? Or did I miss some info about a wave of ninja murders in the UK?
Comment on Ninja sword owners will be paid to surrender weapons before ban
unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 11 months agoYeah, i mean if someone really wants to decapitate someone they can just go to the next best hardware store and get a chainsaw. This is so pointless.
Obi@sopuli.xyz 11 months ago
ohulancutash@feddit.uk 11 months ago
This will probably be a reaction to the Hainault sword attack last year which resulted in the murder of a schoolboy, attempted murder of others, and an attack on a sleeping family, using a samurai sword. The trial is due to start tomorrow.
stray@pawb.social 11 months ago
They are unfortunately being used by children, who understandably think they look sick as shit, to murder each other. Here are some “highlights”:
unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 11 months ago
I don’t think they’re ever really used for crimes?
Yeah there are probably more deaths from chainsaws than those swords. But yeah ofcourse in this case there is no legal use case other than artistic value. For things like folding knives tho there are lots of good legal uses and they are still banned.
shani66@ani.social 11 months ago
Wait, they ban basic knives as well? Might as well ban nail clippers!
smeg@feddit.uk 11 months ago
I think you’re only banned from carrying locking knives (or big knives) in public without a good reason, so on the very off-chance you were questioned by plod then “I’m a tradie going to work” or whatever should be a fine explanation.
tal@lemmy.today 11 months ago
archive.is/52YjV#selection-515.0-533.242
I will bet you that Parliament would be willing to impose a ban on possession of a chainsaw without just cause.