We have I-Root and K-Root in Europe, these are certainly used…
Comment on [deleted]
Ironfist@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
They need to look into using alternative root servers for DNS and domain registrations as well.
cestvrai@lemm.ee 2 months ago
Comment on [deleted]
Ironfist@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
They need to look into using alternative root servers for DNS and domain registrations as well.
We have I-Root and K-Root in Europe, these are certainly used…
Buelldozer@lemmy.today 2 months ago
Multiple countries in Europe are already working overtime to rat-fuck DNS. I’d prefer if euro-leadership remained blissfully unaware of the root DNS servers.
xnx@slrpnk.net 2 months ago
What do u mean?
stoy@lemmy.zip 2 months ago
There are several governments in Europe and abroad that have ordered DNS lookups for specific domains to be blocked.
They probably mean that we can’t trust the government to keep information free and need a way to restrict governments from blocking DNS lookups.
Unfortunately, you can’t really do DNS in a decentralized manner as the concept is based on a hirarchy.
Example:
If you want to go to www.coolsite.org your computer would make the following requests:
I don’t really know how to decentralize this…
ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 months ago
You very much can! As long as you understand that every . is a new level of hierarchy. And that hierarchy can be arranged, in any manner one desires. You can even have a different . as the root.
For example, you can be THE ROOT for all .stoy domains. You just have to get others to honor that, and ask you for addresses of anything in .stoy’s inventory. Of course, they can all tell you to piss off, and instead trust someone else is the true owner of .stoy.
And, honestly? Nothing at all is wrong with that!
What is wrong is right now, EVERYONE agrees that a handful of never-changing owners of .com, .org, .net domains (And other TLDs) is THE ONE TRUE ANSWER FOR US ALL. I didn’t agree to that. Did you? Do you enjoy Verisign being the one true keeper of .com?