Pretty much been covered by others already.
Comment on Fucking leeches
BombOmOm@lemmy.world 16 hours agoHow is it legal that people buy property and rent to those who want to rent instead of buy? My question to you is why wouldn’t it be legal?
feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 hours ago
those who want to rent instead of buy?
Who actually wants to spend 1/3 of their paycheck on something every month and not own it?
fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 6 hours ago
1/3 income these days is if you’re lucky
BombOmOm@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
Biggest plusses people argue in favor is not having to maintain the property yourself and being able to move much more easily. If you are one of the people who would prefer to buy, I highly recommend you do so. Maintaining your own stuff is quite nice, as it lets you keep it up to the quality you desire.
rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 hours ago
Lmao this guy thinks landlords maintain the property.
Great, you can move more easily to another overpriced unmaintained property. You will own nothing and you will be happy about it.
langsamerduck@lemm.ee 15 hours ago
My exact thoughts. Never had anything in my apartments maintained by the landlord, always had to maintain everything myself at my own expense. And despite maintaining it for them, they still keep our deposits when we try to leave.
Keep our deposits, jack up rent despite doing nothing for us, and when they sell to a new landlord you have rich freaks coming into your home while you’re eating your lunch in your kitchen to stare at you and inspect the place to decide if they want to purchase you or not.
TheLoneMinon@lemm.ee 14 hours ago
It dawned on my that my wife and I pay 30k a year to live in our house. I made 65k last year, the most I’ve ever made and the amount I told myself in Highschool that if I could get a job making that I’d be set. Feels like I’m still bussing tables at fucking Texas Roadhouse.
For context, im in tech and she’s in the arts. Combined we’re at about 110k a year. Wild that that feels like just scraping by.
Bagels@lemmy.ca 15 hours ago
In principle it’s fine and it fulfills a market need… not everyone wants to buy. But in practice, under regulation in a market where many people want to buy but can’t, it exacerbates wealth inequality by reducing the available housing and driving up home costs. This in turn drives up rental costs. It’s a nasty cycle.
BombOmOm@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
Absolutely, a problem that is improved by increasing housing supply (thus lowering costs). We need more government investment in building homes and to remove barriers to prevent homes from being built. Simply outlawing rentals would do the opposite, it would take out a huge chunk of people who are building homes, drastically lowering supply and exploding housing prices.
Katana314@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
There are definitely alternatives, where there is more tax incentive to own one home that you live in, and increasing penalties for holding more properties, especially for a long period of time and especially if they are in areas of high housing demand.
OP isn’t directly suggesting making rentals illegal; in fact it’s a bit vague what specific practice they’re blaming. My best guess is that they generally don’t feel laws should allow/incentivize owning so many housing properties, especially if one is not personally doing anything to earn money from them.
Lyrl@lemm.ee 11 hours ago
A responsible landlord is “doing” arrangements for property maintenance and handling all tax and other legal requirements, and my hard feelings are towards slumlords who let dwellings become unsafe, or property flippers who kick all the renters out and build new dwellings to sell to more wealthy buyers.
But also, isn’t the hate for landlords equally applicable to banks and other financial institutions that hold mortgages? They really are earning money by no other responsibility than having the capital available at the start.
bearboiblake@pawb.social 12 hours ago
The solution is for the state to guarantee that everyone must have a place to live. Shelter is a human necessity, it should not be conditional.
Lyrl@lemm.ee 11 hours ago
Are you envisioning the government being a major landlord, like in Singapore? It seems to work really well for that country, but Americans seem uncomfortable with the idea of government housing.