From the linked court document in the article: …courtlistener.com/…/gov.uscourts.insd.215482.99.…
“For the reasons set forth above, the Undersigned, in his discretion, hereby RECOMMENDS that Mr. Ramirez be personally SANCTIONED in the amount of $15,000 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 for submitting to the Court and opposing counsel, on three separate occasions, briefs that contained citations to non-existent cases. In addition, the Undersigned REFERS the matter of Mr. Ramirez’s misconduct in this case to the Chief Judge pursuant to Local Rule of Disciplinary Enforcement 2(a) for consideration of any further discipline that may be appropriate”
Mr. Ramirez is the dumbass lawyer that didn’t check his dumbass AI. If you read above the paragraph I copied from, he gets laid into by the judge in writing to justify recommendation for sanctions and discipline. Good catch by the judge and the processes they have for this kind of thing.
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
Eh, they should file a complaint the first time, and the state bar can decide what to do about it.
AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
“We have investigated ourselves and found nothing wrong”
chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
The bar might get pretty ruthless for fake case citations.
sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 5 weeks ago
I would hope that gross negligence and incompetence with come with severe consequences.
shalafi@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
The state bar is not the state cops.