IMO bridgy is not well designed. The fact that it requires both the follower and the followee to specifically opt in basically makes it DOA. Both Mastodon and BlueSky are completely open and public in terms of post visibility, so bridgy should have been designed to require explicit opt outs from anyone who didn’t want their content bridged.
Zagorath@lemm.ee 6 days ago
IMO bridgy is not well designed. The fact that it requires both the follower and the followee to specifically opt in basically makes it DOA. Both Mastodon and BlueSky are completely open and public in terms of post visibility, so bridgy should have been designed to require explicit opt outs from anyone who didn’t want their content bridged.
Natanael@infosec.pub 6 days ago
Bridgy started without that requirement and it pissed off too many Mastodonians so they reworked it
muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 6 days ago
Well fuck the mastodonians their stupidity is no reason to make everyone else’s experience shitter.
Zagorath@lemm.ee 5 days ago
I would have put it in less harsh terms, but yes, basically this.
Irelephant@lemm.ee 4 days ago
The fediverse hoa had a bit of a problem with it, ignoring the fact that federation is opt out by default.