They’re all referencing the same interview and the same quotes from the same person… None of them seems to disagree on what he said. He just literally doesn’t in any of the quoted parts in any of the articles linked confirm what your news article claimed it confirms. That’s the difference.
surph_ninja@lemmy.world 4 days ago
You should watch this Jeffrey Sachs interview. He’s also wrote a number of articles delving into the details.
youtu.be/23mMpACix_E?si=EIJriHL6UIjznQIb
Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 4 days ago
>Doesn’t actually address any of the points mentioned
>Drops in a 26 minute video
>“Just watch this bro”
Fucking bravo.
surph_ninja@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Yes, I understand it’s frustrating when we deviate from the NATO script. Can this bot not digest videos? He’s written a number of articles about it, too. Here’s one:
jeffsachs.org/…/s6ap8hxhp34hg252wtwwwtdw4afw7x?fo…
Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 4 days ago
Article is better, but even better would be if you quoted a part that’s actually relevant to whatever point you’re trying to make. And perhaps even stated what point you’re trying to make.
If this is still about Ukrainians being “western handlers ordered them to keep fighting”, your linked article doesn’t give you much help:
So much so for Western handlers ordering them to keep fighting. Wah-wah.
Lumbardo@reddthat.com 4 days ago
Why are you just throwing links? You should at least make an attempt to quote your sources so you don’t leave people here reading erroneous information. @Kusimulkku at least gave you the courtesy of doing that.
AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 3 days ago
Bro you just expect me to look at a primary source after copying and pasting a wikipedia article? how do you think internet arguments work??
Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 days ago
You know Wikipedia has their sources in these things [1] and it links to the actual source. Wikipedia in itself isn’t the source. And the source for all of them (including the other guy’s news article) was the exact same interview.
Definitely not good form to not make any points, but just drop a link to a 26 min video. It’s the same as saying source: a whole book. You make the argument and cite the parts you’re using for your argument. It’s sorta internet arguments 101.