The Wikipedia entry referencing news articles doesn’t mean much if the articles themselves are pushing western propaganda. Especially considering how many news agencies are (or were) on the payroll of USAID, I wouldn’t expect to see them challenge the NATO narrative.
Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 4 days ago
They’re all referencing the same interview and the same quotes from the same person… None of them seems to disagree on what he said. He just literally doesn’t in any of the quoted parts in any of the articles linked confirm what your news article claimed it confirms. That’s the difference.
surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 days ago
You should watch this Jeffrey Sachs interview. He’s also wrote a number of articles delving into the details.
youtu.be/23mMpACix_E?si=EIJriHL6UIjznQIb
Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 days ago
>Doesn’t actually address any of the points mentioned
>Drops in a 26 minute video
>“Just watch this bro”
Fucking bravo.
surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Yes, I understand it’s frustrating when we deviate from the NATO script. Can this bot not digest videos? He’s written a number of articles about it, too. Here’s one:
jeffsachs.org/…/s6ap8hxhp34hg252wtwwwtdw4afw7x?fo…
AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 3 days ago
Bro you just expect me to look at a primary source after copying and pasting a wikipedia article? how do you think internet arguments work??