Haven’t Debian and most other distros stopped supporting “i386” for quite a while now? I remember reading something like that, but they still have 32-bit isos up.
Comment on Nearly half of Steam's users are still using Windows 10, with end of life fast approaching
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 days agoFun fact: if you run a newer kernel version on old hardware you will get better performance than running a kernel from when the hardware was released.
kungen@feddit.nu 5 days ago
zurohki@aussie.zone 5 days ago
IIRC a bunch of distros moved to i586 or i686 as their minimum CPU version, which means packages get compiled with instructions that aren’t supported by 386 and 486 CPUs. So those 32-bit ISOs only work on relatively recent 32-bit chips and will crash on chips which are 30+ years old.
notanapple@lemm.ee 5 days ago
It depends. On older devices there isn’t much testing of newer versions of the kernel so they can be more broken than an older version.
Case in point, recently on an old laptop (~12 years) I noticed video performance was real bad which I later found out was due to modern distros defaulting to the
iHD
intel graphics driver. ButiHD
is only supported from 5th gen (Broadwell) onward. So, on older devices anything depending on the graphics driver for hardware acceleration (like video decode) fails and falls back to software rendering.possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 days ago
The kernel scheduler is much better in newer versions
kusivittula@sopuli.xyz 5 days ago
and feels like it got better recently. when i used kernel 6.2 on my (high end) hardware, everything froze when copying a large amount of files. on 6.8 there’s just a bit of delay. still not as good as I’d like, but maybe some day.