There was absolutely no reason to bring up that you were coding longer than I was alive other than to imply that your age is a reason why the argument is invalid.
Funny how you use your age as an argument but see it as entitled when I point out the reverse.
Calling your operating system “Linux”–when Linux is just the kernel and not the OS–doesn’t really help your argument here.
I specifically referenced Gnu tools, window managers, etc. What is wrong with you?
Xanza@lemm.ee 1 day ago
So since you’ve clearly forgotten, let’s go back in time.
This is exactly what you wrote;
I mean Jesus Christ my guy.
Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Having never written Windows kernel code, you are in no position to judge the foundation.
No, you said you have been writing code longer before I was born.
I have been writing code since before you were born. Does that make my opinion more valid?
The source I lonked clearly explains in detail why code is misread. You handwaved it away with the premise that code might not be misread. With that attitude, memory safety isn’t needed either. Write perfect code and you don’t need to use structured programs. “Don’t do what everyone does because it is extremely hard.” isn’t a valid argument.
" It would be insane to claim that all of Linux (I’m also referring to all the gnu tools, window managers etc) should be thrown out and start fresh. "
I added that in the second sentence because I realized you are a child who has never used Linux without it being part of a distro. The first Linux I ran was compiled without being part of any distro. It was for a PRI Gateway when I was working for Vint Cerf on his side project.