Comment on New year, new me

<- View Parent
PP_BOY_@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

How do you feel about Deepfakes? We all recognize that the person in the pic is Danny Devito but where’s he credited? Do you think he got any say or reimbursement for having his likeness stolen?

Even in this spirit there are so much funnier stills from ISAIP that could’ve been used with credit to the creators that would’ve got the same point across. This trash appeals only to the lowest common denominator of people online (see: X)

AI (image diffusion) is garbage and I can’t wait until idiots realize it’s only available right now for pennies on the query at an enormous deficit by billions in slush funds who are trying to prove a concept. But I don’t trust Xwitter idiots (and the people who eat their shit up) to not just add another $19.99/month subscription to their “budget.”

And they made a good picture with said tool.

Wrong. Even ignoring personal taste, “they” didn’t “make” anything. A computer software “made” a picture based off stealing the metadata of decades of human-made content. A person typed in a string of words and clicked a button a few times until they saw a picture that they liked.

Finally

Creativity: … I don’t feel a sense of pride when I order a burger from Burger King. I don’t think, “I made that” simply because I ordered the burger. However, if I make the buns from scratch at home and make the vegetarian hamburger patties from scratch at home and put together a burger, the process is vastly different and I did create a burger while experiencing the pleasure of the process of making it happen. This is why I get irritated when someone says, “I made this image” when referring to a generated image. You didn’t “make” anything. You had computer software generate an image for you.

source
Sort:hotnewtop