Comment on Startup will brick $800 emotional support robot for kids without refunds

• uis@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  If only there was law demanding to refund broken products before liquidation.

  source

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    And who is going to pay for that? If they could afford to refund all their customers they wouldn’t be going bust.

    source

    • uis@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Liquidatoon doesn’t mean they have no money. And they still have some assets.

      source
    • Zagorath@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      The law would probably make sure customers whose products are being bricked are counted as creditors. Ideally after employees (unpaid wages) and before investors. They may not get full refunds, but they’ll be entitled to something if it’s possible.

      source
• Corngood@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Surely in that case they could open their software so the community can figure out what it would take to keep it running.

  source

  • BakerBagel@midwest.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Their creditors would sue because thats an asset that can be sold to refund them.

    source

    • Corngood@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Yeah, likely true without some sort of legislation.

      Well at least there’s a business opportunity for someone to reanimate these things and use them to push gacha games and energy drinks on the innocent children they’ve bonded with.

      source
  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I think at this point they have far more important things to worry about than that.

    source
• Zak@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  What they probably can do is issue an update that lets owners point it at third-party servers, and publish the API. They might even be able to publish the source code, though there’s a chance they don’t own all of it.

  source
• SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I bet they can

  source

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Unless they don’t have the money in which case they can’t.

    source