Comment on Solar modules now selling for less than €0.06/W in Europe

• nexusband@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  It’s not only a political struggle. Working conditions are tremendously better in Europe, Environmental Protection as well. Manufacturing photovoltaics takes a huge pile of chemicals that need to be handled properly to not cause any harm to the environment - China neither cares nor has any other incentives to actually do this properly, which is exactly why they are so cheap. Theres also the issue of poor quality, that if you’re manufacturing something that can have a significant impact on the environment, it should “count” and not be waste 10 years later.

  Destroying the environment in one part of the world to “save” a different one due to climate change is just ridiculously stupid and simple minded.

  source

  • Allero@lemmy.today ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I see where you’re coming with that, and in principle, some of the points you make I would clearly share under different circumstances.

    But to me, even with the side effects, rapid rollout of green tech (even if its production is not kept to the best standard) beats slow incremental growth with good standards in place, given the urgency with which world requires it. After all, even poorly produced Chinese options very much do offset their footprint compared to the alternatives.

    There are some points for concern, such as the use of lithium ion batteries, for example, but Chinese companies also think ahead and implement alternative options - in case of batteries, they increasingly work with sodium-ion instead.

    source
  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Manufacturing photovoltaics takes a huge pile of chemicals that need to be handled properly to not cause any harm to the environment

    Source for this? Cadmium is exclusive to 1 US manufacturer.

    source

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      The argument is always “solar/wind still use chemicals” and never “this is the net reliance on extractive industry by energy source”.

      That said, general energy conservation is still important. You can’t cut emissions if all your new power just gets funnelled into Grok style AI.

      source

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        I don’t know that processing silicon is a polluting activity. There is heat involved, and some Chinese producers are 100% solar powered for their processing. Though I’m sure bulldozers or shipps/trucks are involved in obtaining sand.

        I’m not a fan of any appeals to gatekeep energy use to “just essentials” instead permitting growth that people want, and cleaning up the energy use involved.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • st0v@lemmy.zip ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Solar manufacturing is not destroying China’s environment, fossil fuels are. By a massive margin.

    They need to get off that merry go round as quickly as possible. While the efforts they’ve made are incredible it needs to continue to accelerate.

    I wouldn’t say they’ve achieved these prices through subsidies in the way many people think. government support pushed their entire renewable industry ecosystem, western manufacturing went belly up, and now they are reaping the benefits.

    source
  • RaoulDook@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    It seems like China is putting a lot of efforts into becoming environmentally cleaner in the last few years though. I’m hoping that they’ve finally realized that pollution is bad.

    source

    • ZMoney@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      There’s something called an environmental Kuznets curve that suggests that a population will sacrifice environmental health to industrial degradation in favor of per capita income up to a point, after which they are affluent enough to care, and after this environmental health improves. China seems to be at the inflection point. Image

      source

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        They were at the inflection point back in 2008. They’ve been full tilt towards the improvement side of the curve for nearly two decades.

        source