AI is so hot right now and these incompetent doorknobs have FOMO.
NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
How do they not get people don’t fucking want this. It’s like they’re in a race to see who cand develop the shittiest product.
Bezier@suppo.fi 2 weeks ago
GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
I bet you plenty of people absolutely do want this.
Most people can barely use a computer and would love this if it worked well.
You forget a huge percentage of users can barely access their emails.
conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
I could see the appeal as open source, self hosted software.
Not from data vacuums.
sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
They are monopolists/oligopolists, operating like a cartel.
They create new paradigms as they please, because there is no alternative.
Consumer preferences don’t mean dick in a highly uncompetetive market with absurd costs to entry.
Frozengyro@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
They will implement it, they are just trying different methods until one sticks.
fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc 2 weeks ago
Because people are the product, and these anti-features improve the extortability of that product.
spyd3r@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Shareholders are the customers now. People are livestock to be milked dry, worked to the bone, and chopped up and served to corporations.
uis@lemm.ee 2 weeks ago
It’s like they’re in a race to see who cand develop the shittiest product.
Because it is. That’s why it is called enshittification.
pennomi@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
They’re not ultimately making it for people to use. They’re creating a playground for AI to work and learn in, thereby letting their AI access human behavior data that other companies don’t yet have.
Basically it’s a ploy to get a novel set of proprietary data in hopes that their AI gets smarter than the competition.
uis@lemm.ee 2 weeks ago
Nationalize AI companies.