No wonder they got fined for 30 billion $
Comment on EU to Apple: “Let Users Choose Their Software”; Apple: “Nah”.
drmoose@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It’s incredible how long Apple has gotten a pass which makes me wonder why are they so protected.
trespasser69@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Valmond@lemmy.world 1 year ago
What about second 30billions?
SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
I honestly don’t understand why anybody cares. If someone doesn’t want to use the closed Apple ecosystem, just don’t use Apple?
Seems to me that Apple’s most attractive aspect is the closed ecosystem, and I don’t see why they should be forced to change it in this way.
I use GrapheneOS btw- the only Apple device I ever owned was an iPod Touch.
Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 year ago
There are currently two ecosystems covering about 99% of the worlds phones. If you do not want to use either system you are locked out of what has become vital tech.
Opening up this would encourage innovation. It wouldnt be enough for airpods to work samlessly with iphone if they also worked seamlessly with android and “XOS”. They would have to compete on price and featureset.
stoly@lemmy.world 1 year ago
You’re being downvoted because everyone has stopped worrying about Netflix and now the zeitgeist is to hate Apple.
TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
I also hate Apple lol
stoly@lemmy.world 1 year ago
lol
JustARegularNerd@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It’s not about if a company is shafting you then don’t use them. If a company is shafting it’s userbase, it shouldn’t fall squarely on the customers to make a company stop shafting them, it’s legislators and governments with teeth who should do something about it.
Try telling this argument to the team behind Netscape Navigator. Microsoft’s most attractive aspect was using their Windows market share to, in their case, take market share in other submarkets like browsers and word processors. If the customers don’t want to be behind such a dick move, they shouldn’t use it?
TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
But hasn’t Apple always been this way? It’s not like people don’t know what they’re getting into when they choose Apple over Android. Is there something I’m missing?
Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
There’s SO much you are missing
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
The problem is that there’s only really two ecosystems: Google and Apple. If there was more competition, maybe it would be fine if users opt-in to a closed ecosystem, but if there’s only two options, there’s a strong incentive from both parties to collude to prevent new competitors.
That said, I’m similar to you, I use GrapheneOS as well and have only owned the one Apple device (also iPod touch), and I largely avoid both ecosystems. However, going a third way definitely has significant repurcussions, as in I can’t use many apps because they require Google’s ecosystem to function.
TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
Thanks for your input! Is that what’s happening here, though?
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Not sure, I’m not a lawyer and haven’t investigated either party to know for sure. But what I do see is both the App Store and Play Store using “security” as an excuse to lock apps to their respective ecosystems. So whether there’s overt collusion is anyone’s guess, but they both seem to be playing with a similar set of cards.