Comment

Comment on Starfield's first DLC is one of the worst Bethesda and DLCs of all time

Neither of which will matter.

Bethesda’s game design is just too old. Playing Starfield felt like playing an RPG from a decade ago. Bethesda just got complacent from back when they were one of the only companies that could seriously do an open-world RPG, now we have CD Projekt-Red and FromSoftware with wildly different, significantly more innovative gameplay experiences. Hell, even other AAA devs like Capcom have been able to outperform in the open world space, Dragon’s Dogma 2 was a ton of fun.

source

Sort:hotnew top

PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

now we have CD Projekt-Red

Holy fuck gamers really do have the worst memories. Cyberpunk is still a shit game after 4 fucking years of patches. CDPR has like 5 titles and one of them is pretty good. FromSoftware has a legacy of bangers a mile long. These 2 companies aren’t even in the same wheelhouse.

source
- djsoren19@yiffit.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  Cyberpunk is very much not a shit game, it’s a pretty good RPG with a great variety of character builds and fantastic writing. The devs did an absurd amount of work in order to make the gameplay significantly more fun. I’d also make the argument that Witcher 2 is a really good game, and is what popularized the series enough for Witcher 3 to be such a colossally known hit. The two companies make very different RPGs to one another, for sure, but you’re just being a contrarian if you think the pedigree of the two companies is vastly different.
  
  source
  - PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    
    but you’re just being a contrarian if you think the pedigree of the two companies is vastly different.
    
    Even if we ignore all the other bootlicking and fanboying in the above comment, this statement alone is completely absurd. FromSoftware has developed over 50 games and CDPR has…4? Maybe 10 if you count mobile trash? By the year 2000 FromSoftware had released more successful games than CDPR has released total, good or bad, to date.
    
    It’s no wonder that cyberpunk is such a piece of garbage really when you realize every other game CDPR ever developed has “the witcher” somewhere in the title.
    
    source
- yamanii@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  Cyberpunk is not at all a shit game, what are you even on about?
  
  source
- OozingPositron@feddit.cl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  Can Cyberpunk even be considered an RPG? Lmao.
  
  source
  - yamanii@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    Why not? You have different builds and choices affect your ending and quest outcomes, what more do you want?
    
    source
Cethin@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
No, sadly I think the design is too new. Morrowind was 22 years ago. It is the direction I’d like to see them go again. A complex world that feels lived in, and actually gives players options to play how they want and figure things out for themselves. The newer boring “design for everyone” approach sucks. There’s no soul and nothing interesting.

FromSoft is somewhat notoriously old-school. Their game design has directly evolved from their older games. Look at King’s Field and then look at Dark Souls. There’s so much similarity. Yeah, ER is more cleaned up with a fuck-ton more money and technology available, but it’s essentially the same design.

Obviously Balder’s Gate 3 is just an evolution of classic RPG design, and it did very well. I’d argue CDPR also has taken classic RPG inspiration more than modern ones. A modern RPG design wouldn’t do half the stuff Cyberpunk did, because it’s not targeting everyone (and no one).

Modern AAA design doesn’t pick a target. Their target is everyone and everything, so they do nothing well. Classic design is knowing who your game is for and making a game for them and not anyone else. Bethesda is doing the former.

source