Comment

Comment on Amazon tech workers leaving for other jobs in response to return to office mandate

When I joined Amazon, I was told that for some roles in the US Amazon received more applications than corporate employees worldwide - so I assume 1M+.

That number has probably reduced significantly, given we’ve now had two rounds of RTO. I know some recruiters are really struggling to find external candidates to join, and rightly so, but I don’t doubt that Amazon can find someone to fill these roles, or can find someone outside of North America or Europe to take that role.

The FAANG acronym was the worst thing to happen to tech, because people will flock to Amazon to say “I worked for FAANG”. Prestige is a powerful thing to some, and they’ll deal with some insane shit for the clout that comes from being here.

(FWIW, I’ve been at Amazon as a software engineer for close to four years now, and I’ve noticed zero improvement in opportunities afforded to me)

source

Sort:hotnew top

dan@upvote.au ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
“FAANG” is interesting because it was initially only used to represent high-growth stocks that were leaders in their respective fields. It was originally just “FANG” - Apple was added later.

At some point, it changed to mean the best tech companies to work at. I’m not sure I agree with the list, though. I’d swap Netflix for Microsoft (TC is lower but it’s a more prestigious company and work-life balance is better), and I’d swap Amazon for another company. Not sure. TSMC, Nvidia, or AMD maybe?

source
- phoneymouse@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  It’s funny that Apple was added later given that it is the most valuable company… it’s seen the highest stock growth of any company on earth.
  
  source
  - dan@upvote.au ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    Their stock wasn’t growing a lot a decade ago when the FANG term was coined.
    
    source
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

The FAANG acronym was the worst thing to happen to tech, because people will flock to Amazon to say “I worked for FAANG”. Prestige is a powerful thing to some, and they’ll deal with some insane shit for the clout that comes from being here.

The problem is that the clout boost is real. I never worked for a FAANG/MANGA company, but just having one relatively well-known company on my resume opened up options I never would have had. All my interviewers would mention it, even though it was almost 20 years ago.

source
- EnderMB@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  It might have been a few years ago, but having Amazon on my CV has offered almost nothing. If anything, I get fewer legitimate interview offers than I did before.
  
  source
  - Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    I used to work for MapQuest so it might be nostalgia on the part of my interviewers
    
    source
- dan@upvote.au ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  
  MANGA
  
  MAANA. If you’re going to swap Facebook for Meta, you also need to swap Google for Alphabet.
  
  source
- jj4211@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  It’s real and it can suck.
  
  Any time someone has one of the ‘big names’ on their resume, they get to skip the line and call the shots. Problem is in many of these cases, they got fired from those big companies for very blatantly obvious reasons once you work with them. They will tank their new projects, and executives will just say “this can’t be right, Google is such a success” yeah, because they fired that guy…
  
  source
- roofuskit@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Yeah, I’ve gotten multiple jobs in my industry based on a company I worked for like 15 years ago. Just because they’re a major player who is well respected.
  
  source