Comment on Ladies and Gentlemen, the sate of AI.
db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks agoThe problem is that you need to check those sources today make sure it’s not just making up bullshit and at that point you didn’t gain anything from the genai
Comment on Ladies and Gentlemen, the sate of AI.
db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks agoThe problem is that you need to check those sources today make sure it’s not just making up bullshit and at that point you didn’t gain anything from the genai
wurstgulasch3000@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
As I said the links provide some entry points for further research. It’s providing some use to me because I don’t need to check every search result. But to each their own and I understand the general scepticism of generative “AI”
db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
If you don’t check everyone source. It might be just bullshitting you. There’s people who followed your approach and got into hot shots with their bosses and judges
GaMEChld@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
There is absolutely value in something compiling sources for you to personally review. Anyone who cannot use AI efficiently is analogous to someone who can’t see the utility in a graphing calculator. It’s not magic, it’s a tool. And tools need to be used precisely, and for appropriate purposes.
My plumber fucks up I don’t blame his wrench. My lawyers don’t vet their case work, I blame them.
leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 1 week ago
It’s an LLM. Odds are it’s hallucinating the sources and they don’t even exist.
Know what does compile sources for you which are guaranteed to exist and be related to what you’re looking for…? A good old not LLM infected search engine.
If my plumber replaces their wrench for a rabid gerbil claiming it’ll be just as good I’m definitely changing plumbers.
ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
The sources are the same result of the search? Or at least the top results?