Comment

Comment on Ladies and Gentlemen, the sate of AI.

wurstgulasch3000@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

At least it’s citing sources and you can check to make sure. And from my anecdotal evidence it has been pretty good so far. It also told me on some occasions that the queried information was not found in it’s sources instead of just making something up.

source

Sort:hotnew top

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
The problem is that you need to check those sources today make sure it’s not just making up bullshit and at that point you didn’t gain anything from the genai

source
- wurstgulasch3000@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
  As I said the links provide some entry points for further research. It’s providing some use to me because I don’t need to check every search result. But to each their own and I understand the general scepticism of generative “AI”
  
  source
  - db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
    If you don’t check everyone source. It might be just bullshitting you. There’s people who followed your approach and got into hot shots with their bosses and judges
    
    source
    GaMEChld@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
    There is absolutely value in something compiling sources for you to personally review. Anyone who cannot use AI efficiently is analogous to someone who can’t see the utility in a graphing calculator. It’s not magic, it’s a tool. And tools need to be used precisely, and for appropriate purposes.
    
    My plumber fucks up I don’t blame his wrench. My lawyers don’t vet their case work, I blame them.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - ZeroHora@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
    The sources are the same result of the search? Or at least the top results?
    
    source
elucubra@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
When I query an AI I always end with “provide sources and bibliography for your reply”. That seems to get better replies.

source