Comment on Questions about the safety of Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving' system are growing

• echodot@feddit.uk ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  My understanding is that they’re not illegal in so much as they would have to be proven to actually work. Since no one’s ever been able to do this to the satisfaction of the regulators effectively self-driving cars are illegal.

  We have Tesla’s on the road anyway, so I don’t quite understand how that works.

  They are only effectively illegal right up until they’re not. If a company came up with a genuinely self-driving vehicle my understanding is that it would be authorized but they would have to actually demonstrate it, and that’s possibly more than the corporations really want to take on at the moment.

  source

  • AA5B@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    We have Tesla’s on the road anyway, so I don’t quite understand how that works.

    The feature marketed as “Full Self-Drivinng” is qualified as a beta feature undergoing test and that it requires a human to be in control at all times. It also makes at least some effort to ensure a human actually is paying attention.

    You could certainly quibble that maybe it’s not obvious to all, but it is there.

    Also I believe the human sensing was much easier to trick until last fall. But if you have to go out of your way to trick it, how can you claim you didn’t know it wanted a human in control?

    source
  • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    That makes sense. The VW I’m thinking of may have been level 3 (trying to remember autonomous driving levels off the top of my head so don’t quote me on this), as I believe it needed guidance from on-road infrastructure to double check safety issues, which would have obviously been too much hassle for the US.

    The proof of concept was miles ahead of Tesla has ever been, though, so it’s unfortunate that we can’t be bothered to add some sensors to the road

    source
  • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    They are only effectively illegal right up until they’re not.

    Well for Level 4, installation of human-controllable steering wheels and pedals are optional, and there isn’t a system for demanding the human take over at any given time. So in a sense, a street-legal level 4 car will need to be certified before it takes the road, because it simply won’t necessarily have functionality that even gives a human the opportunity to drive.

    source
  • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Top end Mercedes are lvl 4 i think.

    source
• istanbullu@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Aren’t level 4 systems still illegal in the US anyway?

  How can something that does not exist be illegal?

  source

  • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    By creating regulations that apply to the creation of those things? Level 1 AVs exist and as such regulations exist for AVs. These regulations apply to level 4 AVs despite being mostly theoretical.

    The other commenter in this thread basically already answered this as well by talking about how manufacturers need to prove the safety of it before it can be green it.

    source