Thanks! Not quite as wild as I was expecting (kind of surprised this was enough to push them to delete their account)
Comment on Microsoft donates the Mono Project to the Wine team
gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 3 weeks agomyersguy@lemmy.simpl.website 3 weeks ago
gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Mod abuse is mod abuse, regardless of the level. They clearly felt embarrassed for needlessly being mean and getting caught for it after trying to hide the fact.
ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Probably decided “fuck this” and quit volunteering instead of dealing with drama llamas.
Zess@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Not gonna lie he was right about the shuts thing. It’s not a common phrasing but totally legit and you did seem kinda dickish when you pointed it out.
gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Pointing something out is not inherently being a dick. It did not warrant the response, particularly a response that clearly breaks the rules of the community they were trusted with the responsibility to manage.
Zess@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
It was snarky. Some people interpret it as rudeness. He’s still a shithead for sure.
gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
No snark was intended, but I can see why people could interpret it poorly. I won’t claim to be perfect at communicating over Lemmy comments.
Keineanung@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Yep, they had proof.
MonkeyDatabase@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
What was wrong with them removing your comment? You were being annoying 🤷♂️
Their response seemed perfectly measured to someone being needlessly pedantic.
lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 weeks ago
Yes, their comment was extremely annoying, both in tone (whining) and content (TL;DR: “pls spoonfeed me basic reading comprehension”). If the guy simply removed the comment, or issued an official warning, it would be 100% warranted.
However, what they’re saying ITT about moderator abuse is still spot on. The mod in question answered to the whining in tone, tried to cover their own arse with content removal, and then went to whine in Mastodon about the events, or the fact that there’s transparency functionality in Lemmy (the mod log) against the exact same behaviour that they showed there.
So it’s a case where both sides were wrong but given their relative positions the mod being wrong is a bigger deal.
MonkeyDatabase@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I agree with you, but what does a moderator do once they engage with the user other than remove the whole interaction? They deleted the whole thread, not just their opposition.
Seems like the the whining on mastadon about transparency was more because this guy is following them around harrassing them via public modlog screenshots, when on any other forum it wouldn’t even matter… unless it actually mattered.
In this situation, my view is OP made a mess, pissed jannie added to the mess, OP feigned shock, pissed jannie thought better and cleaned the mess up.
Yet OP here is still trying to stir the pot like the mod was silencing their opinion or something. It was a worthless comment.
lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 weeks ago
You think before engaging. And if you fuck it up, you apologise to the community (not to that specific user) for what you’ve done wrong. But unless the content is sensitive (for example, the other user posted something illegal), you keep it alone, at most you lock it.
gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Baseless accusation. Got any proof?
gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
It’s your right to have an opinion on whether or not you think I was annoying. However, the rest of that is just wrong and needlessly rude. My comment was only to point out how many different ways the title could be interpreted without being explicit in what happened. There is no need to be so rude with your wild assumption. I just found the title to be mildly frustrating due to being vague because of the missing word, and I thought I would express that. Does that warrant moderation action? No. It breaks no rules and there was no intent to be disrespectful, nor is there any real tangible proof of any disrespectful intent.
echodot@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
I absolutely agree with you but it didn’t really need to be said did it?
You 100% understood what the title was saying, so complaining that the title was ambiguous, and barely so, was pointless wasn’t it?
Clearly everyone else agreed since you were downvoted.
lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 weeks ago
I could write a full wall of text explaining everything wrong with your comment, but to keep it short:
Cut off the crap. You aren’t fooling anyone here by playing the victim.
barryamelton@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
Didn’t you leave Lemmy?
prosp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Yeah I would ban 24 hours and continue with life.
lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 weeks ago
I’d probably issue an official warning, then see how the poster reacts. I feel like 1d bans are mostly useful when you got the flamewar already going on, between two otherwise contributive members, and you need them to chill their heads.
That’s up to mod style though. It’s possible that your approach works better than mine, dunno, I almost never rely on short bans.
MBM@lemmings.world 3 weeks ago
Pointlessly snarky comments are one of the worst parts of Reddit and Lemmy and I fully support mods putting a stop to that. I guess the important part is to be transparent about it
A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
But if it was transparent you wouldnt be able to see it /snarkyasshole
gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
“Annoying” is subjective, and there is no rule against being perceived as being “annoying” in the community rules.
The only rule is to be respectful, which they did not follow at all, then tried to hide it.
MonkeyDatabase@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Nothing they did appears to have negatively altered the quality of the comments or discussion.
Respect is also subjective. Your initial post seemed to be mocking and disrespectful for no apparent reason. I’d argue the comment section is more respectful with your remarks gone.
Objectively, it appears they were right to delete their account. You’re stalking posts mentioning their site and complaining about this nothing burger.
I would also distance myself from pedantic harrassers and focus on literally anything else productive if I were them.
gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Are you Liam in disguise or something? Why are you trying to make up shit like I’m “stalking” posts mentioning their site? I’m a user of Lemmy just the same as anyone else and when I see posts that bring up this toxic person’s site, I can easily help inform people of their gross manipulative behavior.
myersguy@lemmy.simpl.website 3 weeks ago
The “down” was definitely edited after the fact.
MonkeyDatabase@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
You’re definitely right. But without any sort of context, just the screengrab with the title corrected, it makes OPs rant seem even more pointless.
It could have been one word if they were genuinely confused: “…Shuts?”
Or if they were smart enough to realize it was an error:
“There’s a word missing…”
ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 3 weeks ago
Whether you consider it whining, depends upon the tone you read it in.
I just read that comment and didn’t feel annoyed enough to even give a downvote and the mod’s reply seemed far too annoying.
The username on the other hand…