MisterFrog
@MisterFrog@aussie.zone
- Comment on Survey of Income and Housing results will not be released | ABS 1 hour ago:
Yes, but also this would be a huge scandal which would no doubt come out.
As much as this is a pretty big fuck up, I have decent trust in the integrity of the vast majority of public servants. (Not to say that information isn’t ever massaged or suppressed in the public service, just that a conspiracy of this magnitude would not stay quiet).
Give it a couple of months. If it really is a conspiracy, I bet we’ll find out.
- Comment on Australian taxpayers on the hook to pay Chevron more than $500 million to clean up oil wells 1 hour ago:
Something something, rules based order, something something ruining our reputation.
But honestly, we need to get legislation in place to stop governments making such plainly terrible deals in the first place.
If it’s not profitable, but has to get built, that’s just screaming government should built and control it.
Why we keep subsidising hugely profitable companies is beyond me.
And where old contract terms are unfair, we ought to grow some balls and say: we’re reneging on this as a sovereign entity, because the terms were unfair, and oil and gas companies have lobbied like crazy to make them happen.
We should make these past injustices against Australia, right.
Try let the Americans coup us, at least it’ll be overt
- Comment on The secret deal behind the teenage social media ban 1 hour ago:
I’m not against regulation, without regulation is how we’ve ended up with Facebook Analytica and everyone and their dog collecting mountains of personal information to sell.
Just that they went and decided on this nebulous age verification instead of actual privacy protection we’re sorely lacking in this country (online)
- Comment on The secret deal behind the teenage social media ban 2 hours ago:
It’s honestly a travesty we got this before an Australian version of the GDPR…
- Comment on Illicit tobacco is 'out in the open' but what is the best way to deal with it? 2 days ago:
Yeah, we’ve dropped the ball. You actually need to do some enforcement to make this work, seems like that’s hardly being done. And increases in enforcement would pay for itself.
Making something annoying to do definitely is a winning strategy.
It’s not even criminal to use a VPN in China, but they are banned and make it very difficult use, you just accept your fate that they don’t really work anymore. It’s still possible to circumvent the Great Firewall, but requires way more effort than before. Most people just don’t, even those with a desire to.
Just that for our purposes, it’s for something worthwhile (In my opinion. Smoking is dumb, and as stated in another comment, someone’s “freedom” to do it isn’t convincing if you want to live in a social democracy.)
- Comment on Illicit tobacco is 'out in the open' but what is the best way to deal with it? 2 days ago:
Licencing seems like a good first step (that, I find it mindboggling didn’t already exist).
It’s not like the same level of enforcement is needed continuously.
I kinda do think shutting down and charging shop owners would be enough to massively curb the trade. It wouldn’t stop it, but suddenly it becomes more of a pain to buy.
Currently shops are doing this in the open. How hard would it be, honestly, to make a tip line (internet form), have a small team of inspectors go around, charge and shut people down? It kinda feels like this isn’t even being done.
And if funding is the problem, well, it kinda pays for itself.
Gotta make it juuuust enough of a pain that you either quit, or are willing to pay the extortionate excise.
Can’t really argue with the results, we massively curbed smoking in this country until vapes showed up.
- Comment on Driver who killed a father and injured his 6 year old son sent 44 Snapchat messages while driving 100km/h before fatal crash 2 days ago:
One of your neighbours sounds eminently reasonable
- Comment on Driver who killed a father and injured his 6 year old son sent 44 Snapchat messages while driving 100km/h before fatal crash 3 days ago:
but as long as these loopholes exist, there must be an alternative
The current alternative is pretty funny, if you live in a council who’s really strict about parking.
It’s really hilarious when people park like wankers in Melbourne CBD because there’s an online form you can fill out to sick the parking inspectors on them really quickly depending how busy they are.
I’ve done it multiple times to people parking in the car-share dedicated spots. It’s always Teslas, BMWs, Mercedes.
Though, now we’ve had this conversation, I’ll keep an eye out for oversized car parking too.
Them when they get the fine: wHaT dO tHeY eXpEcT mE tO Do?
Buy literally any other ute/van that easily fits in the spots.
I’m a bastard haha, I can’t wait.
Why I think we should do literally nothing to accommodate this ridiculous vehicles, accommodation is a precedent they will come to expect and feel entitled to.
People already feel entitled to large roads, and right of way for cars. Let’s not give them a single mm.
That said, it is amusing driving through certain housing estates where there is one normal-sized car in the driveway; which is being blocked in by the Dodge Ram that is too big to fit in the driveway.
I suppose they’re doing their best haha
- Comment on Illicit tobacco is 'out in the open' but what is the best way to deal with it? 3 days ago:
Nah. Until vaping took off, smoking rates plummeted.
Smells a lot better in this country compared to the ones they smoke in.
Ugh. (I do empathise with people who’ve picked up the habit, but not those who advocate for it)
Say what you will, the taxes worked, and have without a doubt saved us a tonne in avoided medical costs from all the people who gave up or never started smoking in the first place.
People talk as if a black market existing somehow negates the benefits of smoking reductions.
If it’s black market, it’s still more of a hassle to buy. Unless it’s really out of control. In which case the answer is blaringly obvious.
Law enforcement.
- Comment on Driver who killed a father and injured his 6 year old son sent 44 Snapchat messages while driving 100km/h before fatal crash 3 days ago:
I vote we don’t do that because it’s taking up valuable space that creates urban sprawl. We already have dedicated truck parking (as in, actual trucks, not oversized utes & SUVs) in places where they’re needed for deliveries.
Utes have fit in regular parking spots for decades. We should just say - no, these oversize utes/SUVs just can’t be bought.
Have you ever wondered why you even need a car to pop to the shops?
Because we’ve designed our cities around cars. (Unless you live in the CBD or other dense pockets in this country where you can literally just go downstairs. Weekly shop? What’s that?).
Let’s not have them park anywhere (in my opinion).
Make them buy a real vehicle, not one for emotional support.
- Comment on Driver who killed a father and injured his 6 year old son sent 44 Snapchat messages while driving 100km/h before fatal crash 3 days ago:
You simply don’t understand why most people in this country are against the death penalty.
I’m not defending his actions whatsoever, even want to see his sentence extended.
If you’d like to actually read my position as to why I, and most of this country (though perhaps not for the same reasons as me) are against the death penalty, you will see you’re being a bit dishonest by saying I’m defending him.
You’ve literally just repeated the same thing twice.
And it looks like you don’t want to actually engage in an honest defence as to why society should have the death penalty.
- Comment on ‘Sheer luck’: how German backpacker Carolina Wilga was found after 11 nights lost in dense Australian outback 6 days ago:
I think they need this exactly wording. The swear words in particular would hopefully make it sink in
- Comment on Driver who killed a father and injured his 6 year old son sent 44 Snapchat messages while driving 100km/h before fatal crash 6 days ago:
☹️ this does not spark joy
As much as we’re not the US, it saddens me how much we permit cars to rule over our cities
- Comment on Driver who killed a father and injured his 6 year old son sent 44 Snapchat messages while driving 100km/h before fatal crash 6 days ago:
kill them and kill them now
I’m hoping you’re not saying this in real life. Probably getting a lotta these 👀 after nuggets of wisdom like that.
You think a piece of shit like that will ever reintegrate? They sent tens of texts while driving
Why are you so sure they’re incapable of being rehabilitated? Humans are just black and white to you?
Are you ready to have one of your family be killed by a texting driver?
I’m sure as hell that the death penalty would do practically nothing to solve road deaths. Considering the US is far worse than us in road deaths, and they have the death penalty. It’s almost like we shouldn’t design our cities around everyone being required to drive :O
This obviously doesn’t absolve this arsehole of blame here. He’s clearly done the wrong thing, and deserves punishment and years (more than he received) in prison. But it’s just not the Australian way to kill criminals. Even for murder.
Anyway. I would strongly suggest you keep your pro-death penalty stance online only (your opinion, while I disagree with you, very strongly, is welcomed here. Online).
This all assumes you live in Australia, or basically anywhere in the developed world other than the US.
People will judge you, rightly, in my opinion.
- Comment on Card payment surcharges should be banned for debit and credit payments, RBA says 1 week ago:
I don’t like this because it doesn’t incentivise low cost cards. If you don’t then regulate the fees cards can charge, and how payment providers are allowed to pass on those costs to the retailer, it’ll become a race to the bottom on rewards cards, and how much they then turn around to charge the retailer.
We’ll all bear the cost then.
And frankly, I don’t want to pay for others frequent flyer miles.
I’d go one step further and just outright ban rewards cards. That shit is just perverse incentives all the way down.
- Comment on Card payment surcharges should be banned for debit and credit payments, RBA says 1 week ago:
I’m only for this if card providers can’t charge the retailer stupid rates because some people want to use rewards cards, and this would mean all customers, cash or card, would have to cover this cost. Which is a subsidy for the people who can be approved for rewards cards.
I’m actually in favour of the opposite approach. I want it to be mandatory to pay the card fee (but not the payment provider fee). The retailer should be required to pass on the card fee.
This would stop things like Square charging a flat rate for every single type of card, despite EFTPOS being vastly cheaper in most cases.
So, the merchant passes on the cost of their payment provider fee equally to everyone (included in the price), and depending what type of card you use determines how much you pay in transaction fees.
This would incentivise card fees to be low, making EFTPOS much more attractive. And incentivise payment providers to be competitive in their fees (and ban them from charging the
I am not in favour of getting rid of card fees unless we bring in a government controlled payment platform that is run at cost, and all these other cards still have to pay fees.
Getting rid of transaction fees entirely just wraps them all into the cost, and means there is no incentive for consumers and retailers to prefer low cost options. It actually creates a perverse incentive for consumers to choose the cards with rewards points, which is terrible for everyone accept the card provider (and to a lesser extent the user of those cards)
- Comment on Driver who killed a father and injured his 6 year old son sent 44 Snapchat messages while driving 100km/h before fatal crash 1 week ago:
Luckily for us, most of society (in Australia, at least) disagrees with you.
The death penalty is barbaric, and has had many, many, many cases of being committed on innocent people in the US.
The justice system isn’t omnipotent, it’s just humans, afterall. Why yes, let’s make the consequence for getting it wrong death, that seems logical /s
This guy is a piece of shit, and in my opinion deserves more than 6 years of prison and a lifetime ban on operating any motor vehicle (or any heavy machinery full stop), but killing him?
This isn’t Gilead, and eye for an eye is not most Australians values.
Part of living in a society is paying taxes, and some of those taxes will go to things you don’t personally like, but society does (corruption, lobbying and inefficient notwithstanding).
And society has decided we’re living in 2025, not the middle ages. We don’t kill people. We aspire to giving people a second chance. In the grand scheme of things, prisons represent a tiny fraction of Australia’s budget.
I’d say it’s totally worth it if it means people’s family members aren’t being killed for doing something illegal.
There are some cases where the person is question is irredeemable, but I see this as the “cost of doing business” so to speak.
It’s the same reason we have innocent until proven guilty, better to let some guilty people walk free than lock up innocent people. And better to let some awful people live, rather than accidentally kill someone who doesn’t deserve it.
There’s a reason most civilised countries don’t have the death penalty anymore.
- Comment on Driver who killed a father and injured his 6 year old son sent 44 Snapchat messages while driving 100km/h before fatal crash 1 week ago:
Based !fuckcars@lemmy.world enjoyer?
May I also interest you in: …org.au/…/revised-standard-recommends-larger-park…
Luckily, they got massive backlash, and haven’t yet actually updated the standard after almost 2 years since.
I’m gonna be really angry if they do increase parking bay sizes.
Gotta love urban sprawl
- Comment on Deputy PM refuses to say if Chinese warships targeted Australian cities 4 weeks ago:
This reads as you would expect from Newscorp. The way it’s written is clearly biased towards a US agenda.
“Targeting our cities” seems like a weird way to put this, seems like emotionally charged language.
At no point does the article actually mention how the Chinese were targeting Australia cities.
Unless they’re actually firing something at a city, is it targeting? Intimidating perhaps? Even then, they just passed by.
The deputy PM’s response makes way more sense than what this piece seems to be implying.
It then straight up puts forward the American agenda on military spending and the strategic interests of Taiwan. Unlike the Australian side where it just quotes, it straight up takes a position for the Americans.
There’s so much actual stuff to be criticising China for, but this passing by isn’t one of them.
This shit is manufacturing consent for a future war with the US and China. If the US want to get into a war over Taiwan, that’s none of our business. We are a middle power, and have a tiny military. Joining another war for the US would be a huge mistake. Especially against another superpower.
The current government seems on the money on this one, and absolutely fucking stupid when it comes to backing the US strikes again Iran.
- Comment on Check your energy rates! 4 weeks ago:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergon_Energy
You’re in the situation what we wish to get back to in Victoria, you should feel lucky, not complaining.
“Bargain hunting” for a electricity retailer is absurd. Because the privately owned electricity distributors set the rates, and the retailers just repackage the wholesale rates as fixed cost supply and usage charges. There is no “choice”. (This is the situation in Victoria)
There should be one electricity distributor, the government (this is buy-in-large, your situation), who provides electricity at cost. Because it’s a natural monopoly, there’s no use of having parallel energy transmission wires owned by different companies, which is why that isn’t done anywhere in Australia (in most cases).
This is exactly why our costs are way higher than in Queensland. “Competition” of privatisation doesn’t work.
Thanks Kennett (the Liberal Premier who sold off the Vic SEC).
- Comment on More Australians get their news via social media than traditional sources for first time, report finds 5 weeks ago:
The Sydney Morning Herald
I’m mean, it’s better than newscorp, but let’s not pretend like any Nine-Fairfax companies don’t toe the right wing corporate line.
They are the embodiment of the teals (our socially progressive, economically right wing politicians).
The guardian which is not Australian ranks highest in my mind here. ABC is okay, but after their funding cuts under the LNP they’re way less critical of the government.
- Comment on One million Australians missing specialist doctor appointments due to cost, report finds 5 weeks ago:
Part of the problem is that private health exists, but it can’t cover you for anything other than hospital.
“Extras” aren’t really insurance, it’s a incentive scheme but you basically pay whatever you’re using at cost.
The solution here is not to allow private health to cover the gap between Medicare and the out of pocket cost. The solution is to say, if you charge more than the rebate then it’s 100% private, you won’t get a cent of Medicare.
Watch as private healthcare absolutely bottoms out because they’ll actually have to cover the whole cost, and therefore premiums will rise like crazy.
How we we afford this? We’re already affording it. We subsidise private health, we pay insurance premiums. If you can convince people: oh hey, want cheaper health insurance? Oh hey, what’s this? You can pay LESS in universal healthcare than you do in premiums!
Lots of people would go for it. A lot of us have private health insurance because of how the incentives are currently set up. We don’t want it. Before the tax concessions no one wanted it.
You’d have to couple it with a massive investment in Medicare, completely removing all tax concessions for private health (which they should have never implemented in the first place). Better pay for medicos.
But we can damn well afford it now, just that it’s politically difficult, especially with the corporate media, and everyone wanting taxes to go down (which I personally think is dumb as fuck).
We need to put private health in the bin where I belongs. Hybrid systems are shit.
- Comment on One million Australians missing specialist doctor appointments due to cost, report finds 5 weeks ago:
I second this, but make it +0% or else 100% private.
Honestly, we need most medicos to be employees, and they can start a union to keep conditions and pay appropriate.
Our subsidy system is just funneling money into practice owner’s pockets, who set prices based on supply and demand, which is a fucked way to run a healthcare system.
Let’s just pay the average medico more, while skipping all the profits were subsidising.
- Comment on Australia condemns LA Police for rubber bullets after quietly arming our own 5 weeks ago:
We recently did have protests because of the recent death in custody in the NT. But you’re right, they’re not terribly large.
Even the weekly Palestinian protests are larger.
- Comment on *Wiitching Hour at Northland* - an important video about how Aussies can prevent Nazis promoting themselves and gaining power 5 weeks ago:
They can’t form a political party. Right? We do not have freedom of speech in this country. Hate speech is illegal. At least, I would think so?
Ignoring their 3:30AM flashmobs seems prudent.
Don’t give them the light of day
- Comment on Could this be the death of Australia's nightmarish welfare system? 5 weeks ago:
Private providers in a public system is ridiculous in my opinion. Here’s an idea, hire them directly instead of paying for a profit margin. :O (this opinion extends to Medicare providers, also)
What I recall being ridiculous was the wait on Centrelink applications. (It’s been a number of years since being off Centrelink so don’t haven’t paid attention recently)
Waiting 3 months was an option for me, but Christ, I can’t imagine how shit that must be who need immediate stability.
I also very much hope Labor update payment rates. Where are you gonna find a place anywhere near services and public transport to rent cheaply enough in order to actually get by?
If only we heavily invested in public housing, I’d wager we’d either end up saving a bunch of money not going to private landlords, or otherwise massively increase the amount in the pockets of people on Centrelink, because it wouldn’t be going to landlords…
Alas.
- Comment on Wealthy Australians are worried we might realise how rigged the system is in their favour 5 weeks ago:
Make $100,000 from selling your labor. 2024-25 FY: $20,788 (not including deductions)
Make $100,000 from selling your appreciating assets: $5,788.00
Gotta love that capital gains discount…
- Comment on Ben Roberts-Smith loses bid to overturn defamation case loss 2 months ago:
This travesty is that he’s not been prosecuted for murdering people/war crimes (allegedly)
- Comment on Not difficult to understand 2 months ago:
This is on you then. Providing finished documents in an editable format just feels wrong to me
- Comment on Not difficult to understand 2 months ago:
Just lie. There is absolutely nothing unethical about lying about timeframes on your resume.
Looking for a job after being made redundant, but still in good standing with your former coworker or manager? Just say you still work there.
Otherwise they’ll have way more leverage when it comes to salary negotiation.
My friend did this when he got made redundant, landed a well paying job, after months of being unemployed.
You have no reason to have a gap on your resume because you’ll be unfairly punished for it.
Just lie. It’s 100% ethical.