oshitwaddup
@oshitwaddup@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
- Comment on Shit story 11 months ago:
Absolutely
- Comment on Hormones are powerful drugs. Taken by everybody. Creating massive aggresstion, obsession and mental disturbance. What would freedom from its influences look like for a society? An individual? 11 months ago:
Probably just go extinct very quick
- Comment on Shit story 11 months ago:
another banger from crackermilk (check them out on youtube)
- Comment on kbin instance running on green energy? 11 months ago:
Yep, the lemmy devs seem to actively want lemmy to not have that functionality 😔
- Comment on Ignorance is only really appreciated in retrospect. But the damage happens in the present. So how do we avoid the damage? 11 months ago:
Proactively seek out relevant info, proactively update based on new information, and murphy-jutsu/pre-hindsight (imagine the situation has failed horribly. What went wrong?), to name a few things that help
- Submitted 11 months ago to energy@slrpnk.net | 10 comments
- Comment on Firefox for Android now supports over 450 add-ons 11 months ago:
Also you can put the url bar on the bottom 😍
- Comment on Firefox for Android now supports over 450 add-ons 11 months ago:
divestos.org/pages/browsers the recommended changes from default settings section should have everything you need to know
- Comment on A masterpiece 11 months ago:
Honking*
- Comment on What is the best way to safely and completely erase all data from old laptops? 11 months ago:
In that case, secure wipe should be more than enough
also, if you’re getting rid of them, there might be a charity you can donate them to rather than just tossing them. Idk any off the top of my head, but it seems worth looking into
- Comment on What is the best way to safely and completely erase all data from old laptops? 11 months ago:
It depends how badly you need that data to never see the light of day again. Most likely, you’ll be fine to erase the drives with secure erase options (where it writes 0 and then 1 to the whole drive, and back and forth a few times depending on settings), but if you really really need to 100% guarantee there’s absolutely no chance of recovery, then you’ll need to destroy the drives physically
- Comment on Ifixit gives fairphone 5 a 10/10 on repairability and maintanence 11 months ago:
True, but part of the reason they don’t go for it is hardware things that are missing
- Comment on Ifixit gives fairphone 5 a 10/10 on repairability and maintanence 11 months ago:
That and supporting grapheneos would do it for me
- Comment on I use a goat 11 months ago:
Exactly
- Comment on Grocery Prices are Cucked heres why 11 months ago:
I love making grocery prices watch me fuck their wife
- Comment on Is Proton Unlimited Worth renewing? 11 months ago:
For me, no. I used it for several years but their linux support is not good enough for me. The linux vpn client depends on networkmanager, but I use iwd, so I was sol (loading wireguard profiles is not a good enough solution, too much of a hastle). They also don’t support ipv6 for vpn. Their linux email client doesn’t exist, and on android their app depends on google play services and they refuse to put it on fdroid or host their own fdroid repo.
i switched to mullvad for vpn (linux app works great, they have ipv6, and since I don’t use vpn that often I save money on the months I don’t use it) and tuta for email (they have a decent email app on linux and android, works great without google play services and is on fdroid, and their servers use green energy)
for pass, I’ve used keepass with keepassxc (linux) and keepassdx (android) so proton pass wasn’t a bonus for me anyways
- Comment on Fish have heart too. 11 months ago:
lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz/comment/2243561 I haven’t put my views in those terms before but even here I say my views are based on sentience. I give an example, and I should have been more clear that I’m not strictly looking at the issue from a utilitarian lense although I get why it would come across that way. At base I’m a sentientist, I think there are many reasonable ways to go from there
- Comment on Fish have heart too. 11 months ago:
are your ethical views based on what most people have done historically? Or how most ethical systems view something? What is your ethical system?
what is/are the difference(s) between human and non-human animals that justifies treating humans better than non-humans?
- Comment on Fish have heart too. 11 months ago:
Neither of those are axioms I hold. The axiom “all sentient beings are morally relevant” does not specify how to go from there, and I am not convinced that any one ethical framework is “the one”. There are some things that all the ones I’m aware of converge on with a sentientist perspective, but there are weird cases as well like whether to euthanize stray animals where they don’t converge
- Comment on Fish have heart too. 11 months ago:
Why is sentience too broad? afaik all humans are sentient, otherwise we’d be philosophical zombies (or there would be p-zombies among us)
- Comment on Fish have heart too. 11 months ago:
i think I do understand them, I’ve thought about that problem before. Can you go into more detail on what you mean by internally inconsistent? By my understanding, situations in the world can come about where values need to be weighed, or there are only bad choices available, but that doesn’t mean those values should be discarded or replaced or that they shouldn’t be shared/spread.
- Comment on Fish have heart too. 11 months ago:
That seems to bother you. Let’s taboo the word. When I say “someone”, “anyone”, “person”, etc, I’m referring to a sentient being, a subject of experience, an experiencer, one who is experiencing. Now you can interpret what I’m saying better, do you disagree with the actual points I’m making?
- Comment on Fish have heart too. 11 months ago:
Hell even to get past solipsism you have to subjectively assume to that your mind and senses accurately reflect the world at least a little bit, otherwise gathering any accurate data or reasoning about that data productively would not be possible
- Comment on Fish have heart too. 11 months ago:
Once you go to a deep enough layer I think you’re right. But, the one subjective thing my argument rests on is that you care about your own experience. Anyone who flinches away from touching a hot stove because it hurts cares about their experience at least a little. The next step is recognizing that from an objective view, there’s no reason to think your subjective experience is any more important than anyone elses (subjectively there is).
- Comment on Fish have heart too. 11 months ago:
I don’t claim to 100% live in an ideal way. I try to keep improving but I don’t think I’ll ever be perfect
i think in cases where consent is difficult or impossible to achieve, we should act in the best interest of the experiencer in question. But I think that example is a tough one, at first glance I think we shouldn’t sterilize them, but then when I consider what will almost certainly happen if they’re not sterilized I think it’s probably worth doing the one bad thing to prevent worse things from happening. It’s an example where I think a utilitarian approach makes the most sense, since the variables are relatively clear
- Comment on Fish have heart too. 11 months ago:
The based on the way you are using arbitrary, I see why you think my position is arbitrary. Do you think all positions are arbitrary?
- Comment on Fish have heart too. 11 months ago:
the experiencers should have a say in whether or not they experience it
- Comment on Fish have heart too. 11 months ago:
ok, taboo the word arbitrary. What do you mean when you say arbitrary?
- Comment on Fish have heart too. 11 months ago:
someone experiencing it should have a say in whether or not they experience it
- Comment on Fish have heart too. 11 months ago:
I think that having sex with sentient beings without their consent is extremely immoral