Objection
@Objection@lemmy.ml
- Comment on YSK: Israel is ethnically cleansing Lebanon 9 hours ago:
Oh, look at that, you ignored the question for a third time, as predicted.
Were the reforms an improvement or do you prefer how things were under Mao?
Number 4, let’s go!
- Comment on YSK: Israel is ethnically cleansing Lebanon 9 hours ago:
Were the reforms an improvement or do you prefer how things were under Mao?
Really simple question, and this is the third time I’ve asked it. And you will ignore it for a third time, because you types have no answer to it.
I have no interest in engaging with any of that complete nonsense you just posted.
- Comment on YSK: Israel is ethnically cleansing Lebanon 10 hours ago:
So much projection. Literally you just see a bad thing about the US and accuse China of it based on nothing
Let’s ignore recent history because if you go back you see the enormous loss of life due to shitty policies backed up by propaganda and lies.
Is there a statute of limitations? If a country is at peace for a hundred years, but it was at war before that, is it “cherry picking” to point that out? What about a thousand years? Absolutely ridiculous, just full on comical.
If you have come to terms that China’s ruling party engaged in a cultural revolution costing millions of lives to just become what they literally fought against that is good for you
Do you actually know anything about the cultural revolution? Much of the violence and chaos was caused by independent, student-led militias. Naturally, there were calls for the central government to provide a greater degree of stability afterward.
Also, completely failed to answer my question. Were the reforms an improvement or do you prefer how things were under Mao? It has to be one or the other, or else you’re speaking in bad faith (which you obviously are).
If you recognize that they engage in imperialism and genocide that is good.
I don’t believe claims without evidence, no.
- Comment on YSK: Israel is ethnically cleansing Lebanon 10 hours ago:
Lol what? So wars never end by that logic. The US is still engaged in the American Civil War.
- Comment on YSK: Israel is ethnically cleansing Lebanon 17 hours ago:
Fuck off.
- Comment on YSK: Israel is ethnically cleansing Lebanon 18 hours ago:
You can’t compare China, who hasn’t waged a single war in 50 years
Invading Tibet was an act of war.
When exactly do you think that happened?
- Comment on YSK: Israel is ethnically cleansing Lebanon 18 hours ago:
You can’t compare China, who hasn’t waged a single war in 50 years
I see you cherry picked the years
Unbelievable 🤣
Why did the Chinese lose so many citizens fighting fascist just to adopt capitalism and produce more billionaires than the US this and last year
Because doing so has allowed them to lift 700 million people out of extreme poverty. The revolution that feeds the children gets my support.
Are you a Maoist? Do you think China should’ve stayed the course instead of doing reforms? Then they wouldn’t have billionaires. Or are you just chauvanistically criticizing them regardless of what they do or don’t do?
- Comment on YSK that Joseph Stalin created the Great Terror. He started killing people randomly including artists, generals, doctors, scientists, government officials. Everyone was terrified. 1 day ago:
I suppose you also want the British to die, right? They invaded Iran, a neutral country, and they inflicted multiple devastating famines on India, not to mention Ireland. Why don’t we just kill everybody, then?
- Comment on YSK that Joseph Stalin created the Great Terror. He started killing people randomly including artists, generals, doctors, scientists, government officials. Everyone was terrified. 2 days ago:
Well then, thank God you weren’t the one in power back theqn, or we would’ve lost the war. Hopefully, no one like you ever gets near the levers of power.
The Nazis and “Bolsheviks” did fight each other and become severely weakened because of it. 27 million Soviets gave their lives in the heroic struggle to save the world from the Nazis.
- Comment on Human experimentation, one way or the other. 2 days ago:
Yeah, I know what you were referring to. That’s not a “lecture.”
- Comment on Human experimentation, one way or the other. 2 days ago:
they begin to seriously lecture me about how there is no evidence that cookies make people explode
No one “seriously lectured you” on that.
I’m going to assume there is something mentally wrong with them.
You assume everyone who disagre with you (and many who do agree with you) has something mentally wrong with them. It’s a common symptom of people who think they’re smarter than they actually are.
It’s like a Twilight Zone episode.
Hmm, I’m not sure what that would look like. “In a world… where someone criticizes people for getting vaccinated… people treat that person as being anti-vaccine.” Not exactly a twist.
Dang. I feel like I’m in an I Think You Should leave skit.
Lol, yes, you do seem like someone from an I Think You Should Leave skit.
- Comment on Human experimentation, one way or the other. 2 days ago:
They do. Most people are not as irrational and simple as you are
You keep insisting this but it’s not true. No one except you and the bots are getting confused about this.
Lmao! Yes, I suppose if you simply label all the people who interpret your comment a certain way as “bots” then you can say that anything means anything!
Yes. It is. If you pretend to be a Nazi and spread Nazi propaganda, you are a Nazi. That’s what Mother Night is all about.
Either you misunderstand, or you’re pretending to misunderstand.
If I go around talking shit about people who accept the consensus view on the Holocaust, if I call them all sheep who just believe whatever they’re told, and then I say that actually I accept the consensus view, but it’s because I’m rational and researched it myself, I do not get to hide behind that last part to excuse the first part. If I pretend I didn’t rob a bank, that doesn’t make me not a bank robber. You’re trying to twist Voggnaut’s message around to justify dishonesty.
Again, I’m caught between the two possibilities. Either you’re a pretentious narcissist who thinks you’re way smarter than you actually are (and everybody else) and are quoting Voggunaut to sound smart, or you’re deliberately trolling and throwing that out to muddle the facts.
I’m not doing that. That’s all in your head, pal.
Oh really! So the part where you had that whole rant about “Regulations are written in blood,” that was all in my head, was it? The parts where you’ve repeatedly attacked “political hobbyists” for getting the vaccine, those were also all in my head? The parts where you’ve called me “psychotic” and a “lunatic” for being pro-vaccine, again, all in my head?
Fuck right the hell off with your trolling and your attempts to spread doubt.
- Comment on Human experimentation, one way or the other. 2 days ago:
I’m not though because the vast majority of people are not political hobbyists and they, like me, did not get the vaccine because it was fashionable. They got it because it was reasonable
That was absolutely not the impression anyone would get from reading your initial comment.
Even if I’m pretending to encourage people to get vaccinated, it is still encouraging people to get vaccinated. You are who you pretend to be.
Lol that’s not how that works. You’re actively sowing confusion and doubt and attacking people for being pro-vaccine, and then you defend this behavior by saying you’re actually pro-vaccine. I don’t mind the part where you say you’re pro-vaccine. I mind the other part.
- Comment on Human experimentation, one way or the other. 2 days ago:
Oh come on, you have to be less obvious when you troll!
Yes, I’m sure bashing everyone else who got the vaccine as a brainwashed hypocrite who’s just following trends is the way to encourage more people to get the vaccine. Yes, what a “rational” response to assert that you’re the only person who got it for rational reasons and that everyone else is an idiot.
Come on, you know as well as I do that none of your comments from the very beginning have been about encouraging anyone to get vaccinated. At best it’s about trying to feel superior to everyone. At worst it’s trying to pick a fight and spread confusion and doubt.
- Comment on Human experimentation, one way or the other. 2 days ago:
And you’re calling me a lunatic on the basis that I’m pro-vaccine, the position that you claim to hold.
You’re just a troll trying to stir up drama. That’s all you are, 100%.
- Comment on Human experimentation, one way or the other. 2 days ago:
See, you’re doing it again right now. You’re playing this game of criticizing people for getting the vaccine, attacking motives, while giving yourself plausible deniability by saying that you got it because it was rational.
How do you know that I and other people did not also get it because it was rational? Why do you even care why people got it? If it’s the rational choice, you should be glad that it was “fashionable.”
I guess this does open up another possible interpretation, which is that you’re a narcissist who just assumes everyone else is stupid even when they’re making the same decision as you and feel this need to present yourself as better than everyone else. I’m not sure whether that’s better or worse than simply trolling. You’re a complete, absolute dickhead who’s poisoning the well either way.
- Comment on Human experimentation, one way or the other. 2 days ago:
I wish I was a bot so I wouldn’t have to worry about the diseases you’re gonna spread with your idiotic troll shit.
- Comment on Human experimentation, one way or the other. 2 days ago:
But it surprised me that the crowd that are terrified of Forever Chemcalz, atomz, BPA, microplastics and frequently scream “Regulations are written in blood!” were chomping at the bit to force everyone to get injected with a product from Big Pharma that was fast tracked and bypassed all normal regulations to get to market as soon as possible by the executive orders of a billionaire president they despised.
That sounds a hell of a lot like criticizing pro-vaccine people as hypocrites because we’re supposedly the same group that scream “Regulations are written in blood.”
- Comment on Human experimentation, one way or the other. 2 days ago:
I made a joke about the possibility that vaccines could cause people to explode and they’re taking it at face value.
Nobody took it at face value, you lying troll.
bots bots bots bots bots bots bots
The fact that we don’t put up with your troll shit doesn’t make us bots.
- Comment on Human experimentation, one way or the other. 2 days ago:
The way you troll is by saying more people should be antivax and then explaining (once pressed) that you’re actually pro-vaccine and just want them to be internally consistent with principles they don’t actually hold.
You’re not being clever with this shit, you’re just helping to poison the well.
- Comment on Human experimentation, one way or the other. 2 days ago:
So you can’t name a single notable figure.
“Google it” is that the standard now? All that shows it that some random people on the internet say it. It doesn’t prove that those people are the same ones who support regulations regarding vaccines. It also doesn’t show that it represents any real meaningful movement.
It’s be like if I said, “Why do so many people scream ‘taxation is theft’ and then support burglery?” and when someone asks, “Do they support burglery? Who?” I respond, “Just Google it and you’ll see lots of people saying that phrase.”
You’re just a troll. And one of the worst kinds of trolls, someone who trolls about vaccines. Your stupid little games get people killed.
- Comment on Human experimentation, one way or the other. 2 days ago:
For me, if evidence pops up years down the road that it has a statistically increased chance of causing cancer or whatever, it’s no big deal
So you’re just a troll. “Why don’t more people adopt an unreasonable position?”
There were/are plenty of antivax hippie types. You seem to be trying to lump everyone on the left as being on the same page as them. Who are all these people screaming “regulations are written in blood,” at you? I’ve never heard the phrase in my life. Apparently this represents so broad cultural movement? Can you name some notable public figures who oppose all regulations except when it comes to vaccines?
Or are you just pulling all of this out of your ass to troll?
- Comment on Human experimentation, one way or the other. 2 days ago:
Bruh I’ve hated you pro-disease morons long before AI existed. I don’t care if “everyone agrees with me” except on topics where you’re causing children to die of preventable disease for no fucking reason.
- Comment on Human experimentation, one way or the other. 2 days ago:
Jesus Christ, the Nurglites have come out of the woodwork in this thread.
- Comment on Human experimentation, one way or the other. 2 days ago:
This comment was written by a virus.
- Comment on YSK that Joseph Stalin created the Great Terror. He started killing people randomly including artists, generals, doctors, scientists, government officials. Everyone was terrified. 2 days ago:
Oh no, what a horrible crime to put the country’s interests over his personal concerns. Truly a monster.
Hitler and Tojo started WWII. Putting anybody above them is ridiculous, fascist apologia - especially two of the figures who contributed to saving the world from them.
- Comment on YSK that Joseph Stalin created the Great Terror. He started killing people randomly including artists, generals, doctors, scientists, government officials. Everyone was terrified. 2 days ago:
In addition, the USA supplied weapons and materials to the Soviets and the fucks used them against Finland.
False. The war with Finland happened in 1939 and the lend-lease program didn’t begin until 1941. There wasn’t even a supply route connecting the USSR to the other allies until the Anglo-Soviet invasion of Iran, also in 1941 (which was one of the main reasons for the invasion).
- Comment on fighting evil by moonlight 4 days ago:
Either you’re just ignorant and doubling down to try to cover for that, or you have an incredibly low standard for what counts as “violent revolution” to the point that there’s no reason to listen to anything you say, because evidently voting for a peaceful leader is a “violent revolution.”
Not sure who you’re trying to fool, or if you’re just utterly delusional.
- Comment on fighting evil by moonlight 5 days ago:
“Violent revolutions” like when Mossadegh was democratically elected? Or Jacobo Árbenz, again, being democratically elected?
You are making my point for me. Westerners are so ignorant of the histories of these countries that it doesn’t matter how peaceful they are. You’ll just assume that they’re violent based on nothing. How are you supposed to win public support when the public doesn’t know you exist, and doesn’t care if you live or die?
- Comment on fighting evil by moonlight 5 days ago:
I have no idea how showing a bunch of peaceful movements that got slaughtered “makes your point for you.”
