TokenBoomer
@TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
- Comment on If a leftist ran for president, would liberals support him? 1 day ago:
I don’t know, we should do this and find out.
- Comment on Clippy's coming for you 4 days ago:
I’m waiting for material conditions to that thang.
- Comment on Sympathy for their PTSD 3 weeks ago:
Mis/under -education (propaganda), lies through omission.
- Comment on Mom of the year 4 weeks ago:
That’s just child abuse with extra steps.
- Comment on This man is a parody of himself 1 month ago:
- Comment on US couple blocked from suing Uber after crash say daughter agreed to Uber Eats terms 1 month ago:
All Headline Lives Matter
- Comment on The four horsemen of the dogpocalypse. 1 month ago:
Capitalism breeds innovation
- Submitted 1 month ago to [deleted] | 0 comments
- Comment on Is your writing skibidi? 1 month ago:
- Comment on Pressure washing 1 month ago:
As a dad, I applaud the effort. 👏
- Comment on Is your writing skibidi? 1 month ago:
Don’t mog me, I’m mewing
- Comment on [deleted] 1 month ago:
Bravo 👏
- Comment on Disney knew 2 months ago:
Synchronicity. You are aligned with the universe.
- Comment on Why is Kamala Harris being held at such a higher standard than Trump this election? 2 months ago:
Now this a conspiracy I can get behind. Love it.
- Comment on Why is Kamala Harris being held at such a higher standard than Trump this election? 2 months ago:
The media has to maintain the charade of democracy.
- Submitted 2 months ago to [deleted] | 10 comments
- Comment on Why does the USA have so few legal protections for ordinary people, and how can we change that? 2 months ago:
Capitalism. The answer for most societal problems we face.
- Comment on It's good to be the King 2 months ago:
Missed opportunity
- Submitted 2 months ago to [deleted] | 16 comments
- Comment on 7% ABV 2 months ago:
Ales and lagers are better
- Comment on Inflation? 2 months ago:
I watched Richard Wolff explain that they didn’t teach him Engels at Harvard. He had to study him at a Catholic school.
- Comment on How do people in this day in age become nazis/neonazies sexist or even incels when there is so much knowledge against it? Do they get anything out of being that way? 2 months ago:
Classic bloodfart ‼️ banger
- Comment on How do people in this day in age become nazis/neonazies sexist or even incels when there is so much knowledge against it? Do they get anything out of being that way? 2 months ago:
This was very interesting. Thanks
- Comment on How do people in this day in age become nazis/neonazies sexist or even incels when there is so much knowledge against it? Do they get anything out of being that way? 2 months ago:
Good for you.
- Submitted 2 months ago to [deleted] | 53 comments
- Comment on Consumer, we have detected that you are above the poverty line. The 99¢ price printed on this Arizona tea can only applies to those below the poverty line. Your total comes to $3.67. 2 months ago:
When capitalist alienation got people thinking performativity is direct action.
- Comment on Consumer, we have detected that you are above the poverty line. The 99¢ price printed on this Arizona tea can only applies to those below the poverty line. Your total comes to $3.67. 2 months ago:
I didn’t take the picture.
The reason you can post all those images on the internet is almost entirely because of Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 or Title V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The law essentially provides website providers immunity from third-party content. Generally believed to be the basis for the internet as we know it today, it’s not a given that those protections will remain in place. Giants such as Facebook and Google are under scrutiny from lawmakers for antitrust violations and other misuses of power. No more Section 230, no more upload free-for-all. source
I’m aware of the concerns, but should every meme be copyrighted? Can I not take a photo of my daughter at Disney Land because unconsenting people are in the background?
Maybe the more pressing issue is to address the house less situation instead of berating people who copy paste images. But, that’s just me.
- Comment on Consumer, we have detected that you are above the poverty line. The 99¢ price printed on this Arizona tea can only applies to those below the poverty line. Your total comes to $3.67. 2 months ago:
Noted.
“If you are interested in helping the homeless and drug addicted, volunteer your time, write a check, lobby the government officials in your community. These people are not on the streets for your amusement. They are real people with real problems not a vehicle for your next social media fix. I truly believe that it’s up to each of us to treat our fellow human beings with dignity and respect. The next time you’re tempted to take that shot of someone passed out on the sidewalk or the young person begging for a meal, think how you would feel if that were you or your family member appearing on someone’s Facebook post.” source
But,
The reason you can post all those images on the internet is almost entirely because of Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 or Title V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The law essentially provides website providers immunity from third-party content. Generally believed to be the basis for the internet as we know it today, it’s not a given that those protections will remain in place. Giants such as Facebook and Google are under scrutiny from lawmakers for antitrust violations and other misuses of power. No more Section 230, no more upload free-for-all.
- Comment on Consumer, we have detected that you are above the poverty line. The 99¢ price printed on this Arizona tea can only applies to those below the poverty line. Your total comes to $3.67. 2 months ago:
You can take pictures of people in public:
- Submitted 2 months ago to [deleted] | 4 comments
