L3s
@L3s@lemmy.world
- Comment on Microsoft employee disrupts 50th anniversary and calls AI boss ‘war profiteer’ 1 day ago:
!lemmysilver
- Comment on Not just Switch 2: ESA warns Trump’s tariffs will hurt the entire game industry 3 days ago:
!lemmysilver
- Comment on EU considers tariffs on digital services Big Tech 4 days ago:
!lemmysilver
- Comment on LW: Announcing an April fools charity event! 1 week ago:
Haha, ty
- Submitted 1 week ago to technology@lemmy.world | 3 comments
- Comment on Implementing a spellchecker on 64 kB of RAM back in the 1970s led to a compression algorithm that's technically unbeaten and part of it is still in use today 1 week ago:
!lemmysilver
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
Acronyms are typically uppercase, so TOR makes sense, even if they (Tor) don’t format it that way.
Either way is fine though, what a strange thing to correct someone on tbh.
- Comment on YSK: some places it is a crime to ask questions 4 weeks ago:
Not going to argue with you about it here
This has all been ridiculous.
Have a good one.
- Comment on YSK: some places it is a crime to ask questions 4 weeks ago:
Not an excuse.
- Comment on YSK: some places it is a crime to ask questions 4 weeks ago:
Not going to argue with you about it here, but the short is: if that’s true, when I messaged you, you should have just had a conversation with me about it instead of all of this.
Have a good one.
- Comment on YSK: some places it is a crime to ask questions 4 weeks ago:
Well thanks for understanding. The question itself was not a problem, hopefully that helps as well.
- Comment on YSK: some places it is a crime to ask questions 4 weeks ago:
Because as the mod that removed the post, I’d like to give you my perspective if you’ll let me.
- OP made a post that seemed to break rule 5 (we had multiple reports on it), and did not seem like a good-faith question breaking rule 1, so I removed the post
- OP then makes a second post being fairly passive towards me, further showing that they were not posting in good-faith. So once again, removed the post for rule 1 and 5, messaged OP as well explaining this. This could have been a temp ban, I was being nice here, and reaching out to give OP the chance to explain they were not posting in bad faith.
- OP then posts 13 times about the above in other communities, breaking some of the rules in those communities.
As mods it’s mayhem if you don’t enforce your rules, which is all I was trying to do. IMO OP has proved multiple times now that their question was not in good-faith, and they were seeking out arguments (check their other comments) and drama (see the 13 posts).
Icing on the cake: we left their rephrased question up to avoid more of this drama, OP still kept posting the screenshots.
- Comment on YSK: some places it is a crime to ask questions 4 weeks ago:
Just want to make sure I understand, you blocked a community because they removed a post that broke their rules?
- Comment on Facebook Cybertruck Owners Group Copes With Relentless Mockery 4 weeks ago:
Thank you for understanding
- Comment on Facebook Cybertruck Owners Group Copes With Relentless Mockery 4 weeks ago:
Jesus, the lengths you’ll go to to avoid seeming like the idiot which you are.
I love it when I get it so right I can feel your arsehole tightening up from across the internet.
Those sentences are obviously not being excellent to other commenters here. To avoid a ban (you have broken this rule twice, I’m being lenient) please follow rule 3.
Thanks
- Comment on Facebook Cybertruck Owners Group Copes With Relentless Mockery 4 weeks ago:
Your comment was removed for violating rule 3.
- Comment on Why do most Americans use an iPhone? 1 month ago:
Are you?
- Comment on Why do most Americans use an iPhone? 1 month ago:
Why do most Americans use an iPhone? ≠ Americans, why do most of you use an iPhone?
- Comment on ‘The tyranny of apps’: those without smartphones are unfairly penalised, say campaigners 1 month ago:
Risky click of the day.
- Comment on [meta] c/technologys banner and 'profile?' images are broken. 1 month ago:
Whoops! We’ll get those back shortly, thank you!
- Comment on Apple ordered to open encrypted user accounts globally to UK spying 1 month ago:
Lol whoops
- Comment on Apple ordered to open encrypted user accounts globally to UK spying 1 month ago:
Could you post that in the body for us?
We’re getting reports of this not being news/an article
- Comment on Why I am not impressed by A.I. 1 month ago:
My experience has been very different, I do have to sometimes add to what it summarized though. The Bsky account is mentioned is a good example, most of the posts are very well summarized, but every now and then there will be one that isn’t as accurate.
- Comment on Why I am not impressed by A.I. 1 month ago:
Most of what I’m asking it are things I have a general idea of, and AI has the capability of making short explanations of complex things. So typically it’s easy to spot a hallucination, but the pieces that I don’t already know are easy to Google to verify.
Basically I can get a shorter response to get the same outcome, and validate those small pieces which saves a lot of time (I no longer have to read a 100 page white paper, instead a few paragraphs and then verify small bits)
- Comment on Why I am not impressed by A.I. 1 month ago:
Yes, I’m saving time. As I mentioned in my other comment:
Yeah, normally my “Make this sound better” or “summarize this for me” is a longer wall of text that I want to simplify, I was trying to keep my examples short.
And
and helps correct my shitty grammar at times.
And
Hallucinations are a thing, so validating what it spits out is definitely needed.
- Comment on Why I am not impressed by A.I. 1 month ago:
Yeah, normally my “Make this sound better” or “summarize this for me” is a longer wall of text that I want to simplify, talking to non-technical people about a technical issue is not the easiest for me, and AI has helped me dumb it down when sending an email.
As for accuracy, you review what is gives you, you don’t just copy and send it without review. Also you will have to tweak some pieces that it gives out where it doesn’t make the most sense, such as if it uses wording you wouldn’t typically use. It is fairly accurate though in my use-cases.
- Comment on Why I am not impressed by A.I. 1 month ago:
Writing customer/company-wide emails is a good example. “Make this sound better: we’re aware of the outage at Site A, we are working as quick as possible to get things back online”
Another is feeding it an article and asking for a summary, hackingne.ws does that for its Bsky posts.
Coding is another good example, “write me a Python script that moves all files in /mydir to /newdir”
Asking for it to summarize a theory, “explain to me why RIP was replaced with RIPv2, and what problems people have had since with RIPv2”
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
Hey, I appreciate that!
- Comment on Holy 💩, is this legit? 5 months ago:
The report button is always a click away my friend!
- Comment on Devs gaining little (if anything) from AI coding assistants 5 months ago:
Well I would, as well as the other comments you’ve posted in this thread. Let’s take a 3 day break to cool down, be excellent to eachother, differing views on AI isn’t a reason to be shitty to others.