L3s
@L3s@lemmy.world
- Comment on Facebook Cybertruck Owners Group Copes With Relentless Mockery 3 days ago:
Thank you for understanding
- Comment on Facebook Cybertruck Owners Group Copes With Relentless Mockery 3 days ago:
Jesus, the lengths you’ll go to to avoid seeming like the idiot which you are.
I love it when I get it so right I can feel your arsehole tightening up from across the internet.
Those sentences are obviously not being excellent to other commenters here. To avoid a ban (you have broken this rule twice, I’m being lenient) please follow rule 3.
Thanks
- Comment on Facebook Cybertruck Owners Group Copes With Relentless Mockery 3 days ago:
Your comment was removed for violating rule 3.
- Comment on Why do most Americans use an iPhone? 1 week ago:
Are you?
- Comment on Why do most Americans use an iPhone? 1 week ago:
Why do most Americans use an iPhone? ≠ Americans, why do most of you use an iPhone?
- Comment on ‘The tyranny of apps’: those without smartphones are unfairly penalised, say campaigners 1 week ago:
Risky click of the day.
- Comment on [meta] c/technologys banner and 'profile?' images are broken. 3 weeks ago:
Whoops! We’ll get those back shortly, thank you!
- Comment on Apple ordered to open encrypted user accounts globally to UK spying 4 weeks ago:
Lol whoops
- Comment on Apple ordered to open encrypted user accounts globally to UK spying 4 weeks ago:
Could you post that in the body for us?
We’re getting reports of this not being news/an article
- Comment on Why I am not impressed by A.I. 4 weeks ago:
My experience has been very different, I do have to sometimes add to what it summarized though. The Bsky account is mentioned is a good example, most of the posts are very well summarized, but every now and then there will be one that isn’t as accurate.
- Comment on Why I am not impressed by A.I. 4 weeks ago:
Most of what I’m asking it are things I have a general idea of, and AI has the capability of making short explanations of complex things. So typically it’s easy to spot a hallucination, but the pieces that I don’t already know are easy to Google to verify.
Basically I can get a shorter response to get the same outcome, and validate those small pieces which saves a lot of time (I no longer have to read a 100 page white paper, instead a few paragraphs and then verify small bits)
- Comment on Why I am not impressed by A.I. 4 weeks ago:
Yes, I’m saving time. As I mentioned in my other comment:
Yeah, normally my “Make this sound better” or “summarize this for me” is a longer wall of text that I want to simplify, I was trying to keep my examples short.
And
and helps correct my shitty grammar at times.
And
Hallucinations are a thing, so validating what it spits out is definitely needed.
- Comment on Why I am not impressed by A.I. 4 weeks ago:
Yeah, normally my “Make this sound better” or “summarize this for me” is a longer wall of text that I want to simplify, talking to non-technical people about a technical issue is not the easiest for me, and AI has helped me dumb it down when sending an email.
As for accuracy, you review what is gives you, you don’t just copy and send it without review. Also you will have to tweak some pieces that it gives out where it doesn’t make the most sense, such as if it uses wording you wouldn’t typically use. It is fairly accurate though in my use-cases.
- Comment on Why I am not impressed by A.I. 4 weeks ago:
Writing customer/company-wide emails is a good example. “Make this sound better: we’re aware of the outage at Site A, we are working as quick as possible to get things back online”
Another is feeding it an article and asking for a summary, hackingne.ws does that for its Bsky posts.
Coding is another good example, “write me a Python script that moves all files in /mydir to /newdir”
Asking for it to summarize a theory, “explain to me why RIP was replaced with RIPv2, and what problems people have had since with RIPv2”
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
Hey, I appreciate that!
- Comment on Holy 💩, is this legit? 5 months ago:
The report button is always a click away my friend!
- Comment on Devs gaining little (if anything) from AI coding assistants 5 months ago:
Well I would, as well as the other comments you’ve posted in this thread. Let’s take a 3 day break to cool down, be excellent to eachother, differing views on AI isn’t a reason to be shitty to others.
- Comment on Devs gaining little (if anything) from AI coding assistants 5 months ago:
Trying to belittle or offend others is against rule 3, it is not being excellent to eachother. Let’s do better my friend.
- Comment on Why do I feel sick every time I go out to eat with my gf? 5 months ago:
I don’t have an answer, but congrats on being one of the few to break that friendship zone barrier
- Comment on Elon Musk says SpaceX HQ officially moving to Texas, blames new CA trans student privacy law 7 months ago:
Too many politically charged comments, locking. We are a technology community, if you want to talk politics please do so in the appropriate community.
- Comment on Car dealerships in North America revert to pens and paper after cyberattacks on software provider 8 months ago:
Please report if they respond with their alt, the reported all of your non-rule breaking comments again.
Thanks
- Comment on Julian Assange has reached a plea deal with the U.S., allowing him to go free 8 months ago:
Too many rule 3 breaking comments, locking this post. Let’s be excellent to eachother please!
- Comment on Please read and help 11 months ago:
Hey OP, how can I help? We are here for you
- Comment on A post may receive a hundred replies and host a fat and exciting conversation tree, but if one moderator doesn't like it then it may be locked or deleted. Is that immoral? 11 months ago:
I didn’t avoid your point, I actually answered it: rules are rules and exist for a reason, if you break a communities rules they will remove your post or comment.
- Comment on A post may receive a hundred replies and host a fat and exciting conversation tree, but if one moderator doesn't like it then it may be locked or deleted. Is that immoral? 11 months ago:
Just to be transparent, I’m the mod who removed your posts.
We get a lot of rule breaking posts between the multiple communities I moderate, some of them get upvoted heavily and still get removed.
For example, someone posted a scientific post that had nothing to do with technology in /c/Technology@lemmy.world, it had a decent amount of upvotes and comments. It was still removed for rule 2 of that community, as it was off topic for that community and there are ones that exists for that content.
Sorry that it upset you, but if I could give you advise: just follow the community rules and you won’t have these issues
- Comment on How does employing a rapist not constitute an unsafe work environment for female employees? 1 year ago:
Sorry, too many arguments.
- Comment on I don't know how to deal with what to me is a thin skinned and gossip coworker. 1 year ago:
Heyo! Please reformat your title to follow rule #1
Thanks
- Comment on I wish there were more articles about tech not tech biz 1 year ago:
Please stop reporting this as “not tech related, rule 2”, we welcome the feedback.
Our stance has been, if it’s in a gray area of “tech” such as business related, and users upvote it: that must be what the majority wants.
We will be discussing this more, as it seems some people want strictly tech related content and none of the gray area content.
- Comment on Parents told to delete social media apps to prevent kids from seeing Hamas atrocities — Facebook, X, TikTok and other social media services have been filled with graphic imagery 1 year ago:
Just want to point you to rule 3, that is the reason for removing the other comments.
Thanks for cleaning it up in your edit.
- Comment on Microsoft CEO says unfair practices by Google led to its dominance as a search engine 1 year ago:
Thanks for letting me know! Is it reposting stuff that it already has posted, or things that others have posted?
Not finding duplicates, but can dig in a little more after work.