AustralianSimon
@AustralianSimon@lemmy.world
- Comment on Synology could bring “certified drive” requirements to more NAS devices 6 days ago:
Reliability. We’ve put them in small businesses and they do their job very well VS a frankenpc NAS.
- Comment on Synology could bring “certified drive” requirements to more NAS devices 6 days ago:
The real shame is they didn’t open source the app on decom.
- Comment on Synology could bring “certified drive” requirements to more NAS devices 6 days ago:
You asked the drawback on a thread about Synology.
Doesn’t look like it hooks into their unifi ecosystem which would be a big negative for me.
- Comment on Synology could bring “certified drive” requirements to more NAS devices 6 days ago:
While I agree with the doing whatever you want on a custom build I very much doubt the reliability as per my comment here.
Personally I’ll be moving to rack units when these finally kick the bucket.
- Comment on Synology could bring “certified drive” requirements to more NAS devices 6 days ago:
Only 7 bays and small rack size. It’s a NAS not like Synology + series.
- Comment on Synology could bring “certified drive” requirements to more NAS devices 6 days ago:
Grab one of the 8 bays now, this won’t affect anything currently released. I don’t see me having to retire my 1813+ or 1819+ (both 8bay) anytime soon and both are 4+ years old without a hiccup.
- Comment on Synology could bring “certified drive” requirements to more NAS devices 6 days ago:
The Unifi rackmount NAS looks pretty sweet imho.
- Comment on Synology could bring “certified drive” requirements to more NAS devices 6 days ago:
The reason why Synology is great is their bulletproof reliability.
Sure you might be able to make a PC perform the same spec for spec but will it actually? And even with these devices, they are so far from Apple it isn’t funny, you have to set up a fair bit still to make the most of them.
Honestly HDDs/SDDs are a disposable part of the backup ecosystem, I get that they want some extra money but there are already scripts to overcome some of the existing compability checkers in these systems.
- Comment on Synology could bring “certified drive” requirements to more NAS devices 6 days ago:
I get why they do this sort of thing but it didn’t stop us re-adding video station and h265 support back into our Synos.
Someone already made a script to overwrite the existing compatible drive checker so someone will write a new script to fix the new one.
- Comment on Is it normal to not have any malicious login attempts? 1 week ago:
This way my thought, I highly doubt they are getting none, just not looking at the proxy logs.
- Comment on Adobe Gets Bullied Off Bluesky 1 week ago:
My point is the claimed narrative it isn’t as bad as X. To me it seems the only difference is the person running the show. But then you look at mastodon instances and there is no where near that level of behaviour.
Hell Lemmy is pretty civil if you block hexbear.
- Comment on Adobe Gets Bullied Off Bluesky 2 weeks ago:
I reckon it would have been far sweeter if they were completely ignored IMHO. 1000% more brutal.
- Comment on Adobe Gets Bullied Off Bluesky 2 weeks ago:
I know Adobe is a dick of a company but all this event shows is how toxic Bluesky is. Seems the toxicity joined them from X.
- Comment on How and where should I keep backups of system configurations? 2 weeks ago:
I was hoping for a guide to capture said configs with a recommended subset. Not instructions for using git.
So no the guides don’t help with that.
- Comment on How to harden against SSH brute-forcing? 2 weeks ago:
I think the point behind it is to waste the sniffers time sniffing for ports that it could be using to be making attempts.
Its not a security thing, it’s just increasing the cost to snoop.
- Comment on Is anyone looking for a open source project to get involved in? If so, this might be for you: MediaWolf - a Media Discovery and Download Hub. 3 weeks ago:
The metadata server isn’t updated and hasn’t for a long time so it stops after a point in time and certain authors with lots of books just don’t come up.
Given the readarr team are looking for maintainers to take over, I doubt it’ll be resolved soon.
reddit.com/…/since_readarr_seems_down_for_the_cou…
- Comment on Is anyone looking for a open source project to get involved in? If so, this might be for you: MediaWolf - a Media Discovery and Download Hub. 3 weeks ago:
I’d suggest integrate with LazyLibrarian over Readarr as it’s metadata and ability to add recent books is borked probably forever.
- Comment on Organic Maps migrates to Forgejo due to GitHub account blocked by Microsoft. 3 weeks ago:
Seems like a vulnerability to exploit
- Comment on Selfhosting Sunday - What's up? 3 weeks ago:
Building a simple workflow with AI agent for our community watch group. Also building an open source automation platform, currently working through GUI templates for it.
- Comment on Why I recommend against Brave. 4 weeks ago:
I’m waiting on Ladybird to come out next year into alpha
- Comment on How to update Immich now that I am way behind? 1 month ago:
You’re going to have to read every single release with breaking changes.
- Comment on Low resource, Performant WAF 1 month ago:
I’m trying to block the most likely attack vectors which is definitely VPS providers at this point in time. Here check out my analysis.
- Comment on Low resource, Performant WAF 1 month ago:
No I think f2b handling it would be totally fine for me. Kids got in the way with digging around too much but will try this week.
- Comment on Low resource, Performant WAF 1 month ago:
Ahhhmazing, I’ll set this up tonight. Really appreciate the help.
- Comment on Low resource, Performant WAF 1 month ago:
I’ve used it on a machine before but given I am using a cloudflared container for ingress, can I route my traffic through a f2b container to the app? This might be ideal from a co fig perspective.
- Comment on Low resource, Performant WAF 1 month ago:
I have more than 50k but even that page doesn’t recommend it.
Top of that page
Recommendation: Use WAF custom rules instead
Cloudflare recommends that you create WAF custom rules instead of IP Access rules to perform IP-based or geography-based blocking (geoblocking):
- For IP-based blocking, use an IP list in the custom rule expression.
- Comment on Low resource, Performant WAF 1 month ago:
How easy is it to configure?
My goal is to download some lists from github and generate one big ban list to feed into the WAF but the community lists of Crowdsec might negate the need.
- Submitted 1 month ago to selfhosted@lemmy.world | 15 comments
- Comment on Least terrible domain registrars 1 month ago:
I use namesilo for everything but my .au domains.
- Comment on Help me selfhosted, I'm in over my head! 1 month ago:
Sometimes I miss my r720s but the silence is nice now.
