Are vertical-axis wind turbines really the future?

Comments

• sj_zero ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  There are two things that we really need to pay close attention to.

  The first is nameplate versus actual. A lot of places will puff up their chest talking about how they've installed a gigawatt of solar panels, but then you look at the actual power produced and it's a tiny fraction of nameplate because the sun isn't always up.

  The second is total lifespan energy costs to produce and maintain. Let's say that I have a little box that produces no emissions and produces a kilowatt of energy every year for 25 hours, so 25 kwh. Sounds like a good deal! Well let's say that producing that little box takes 500 KWh to make. What you've just created is not efficient. The amount of energy that you've put into it is much greater than the advantage that you got back.

  It's very difficult to come out ahead on this sort of calculus because the universe doesn't like reversing entropy.

  Properly managed biofuels can work, so growing a tree then burning the tree using the remains of the burned tree to fertilize a new tree. So can solar on a long enough timeline, but it needs to be very well manufactured and we have to be realistic about the amount of energy that we expect. Obviously water wheels and like have a history going back centuries, and windmills in the past have worked as well, but you have to be very careful about them. Start using a bunch of weird materials and getting too fancy and you blow your energy budget.

  Planning to test a vertical axis wind turbine made out of pla in the near future.

  • zksmk@slrpnk.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    Correct. That's the main supposed advantage of these vertical axis turbines, in the context of offshore.

    ... its concept has a simple, robust design with a low centre of gravity, while its moving parts are located close to the water surface, enabling easier, cheaper maintenance.

    The lower center of gravity decreases the size of the submerged substructure and therefore also its costs, and there's also the fact a VAWT doesn't need a yaw system.

    Image

    Main supposed benefit, aside from the supposed windflow benefits, that is:

    When set closely interspaced in pairs, VAWTs increase each other’s performance by up to 15%, the UK-based institute said in its press release, triggering much media attention.

    The researchers argue that VAWT’s in wind-farm array do not suffer from HAWT-related turbulent wake issues created by the first row, which decrease the output of the rows of turbines behind by up to 40%. Using vertical- rather than horizontal-axis machines would not only eliminate this problem, they suggest, but the VAWTs would actually enhance each other’s performance.

    Which is both explained in more detail in the OP article, and most definitely put in question as well(!).

    But yeah, costs are probably even more important than that:

    ...the larger scale of offshore wind turbines and improved materials indicate that VAWT designs may have certain advantages and benefits for floating offshore wind energy installations. For instance, VAWT designs have a lower center of gravity, which would reduce the platform costs. From a systems perspective, that could be a huge breakthrough for floating offshore wind, where the platform is the single largest contributor to the system cost," said Brandon Ennis, Sandia's Wind Energy Technologies Department offshore technical lead. "The turbine represents approximately 65% of the system cost for land-based wind plants, compared to only around 25% for deep-water offshore sites.

    There are downsides too, it's a numbers game. That's why I'm curious what will the full large scale test by SeaTwirl in Norway show.

    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    source