Submitted 4 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world [bot] to technology@lemmy.world
https://9to5mac.com/2024/02/18/apple-eu-fine-music-streaming-anticompetitive/
EU to fine Apple about $500 million for anticompetitive App Store policy in music streaming market::Apple is about to be hit with its first-ever fine from the EU commission, according to a report this morning…
Next week, Nabisco sues Tesco for not telling customers their snacks are cheaper at Aldi.
That’s not at all what it’s like. A better analogy would be:
Government fines Amazon for forbidding Sony from saying you can buy a PS5 for [cheaper price than Amazon] if you buy from the Sony website.
Except it’s actually worse than that because there are hundreds of retailers to choose to sell from, but only two smartphone platforms.
yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 4 months ago
With a fine that small, it’s just the price of doing business.
Weird calling what Apple does “business,” since its anticompetitive practices are metaphorically closer to pollution or violence than legitimate commerce.
Instigate@aussie.zone 4 months ago
Well, yes and no. Paying that fine once would just be a cost of doing business, but now that the precedent has been set if they continue to do it they’ll continue to get fined in that order. Those fines won’t need court cases, so they’ll need to be paid quickly and in full. Sure, the fine they received didn’t really hurt them but it will change their behaviour. It will also prevent others from engaging in the same behaviour.
I don’t think the EU wants to bankrupt companies like Apple - it’s not in the collective best interest. They need to guide behaviour by setting up punishments that are deterring but not destructive. I think €500m fits that pretty well - it’s akin to giving a child a timeout while their friends play or a smack on the back of the hand. It’s doing what it’s intended to do.
dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 4 months ago
If they want it to have an effect it should be $500 million every 3 months until it changes.
rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 4 months ago
Every month, they are a bit company, but I think they can be bothered to notice something like the EU charging them $500m in that time.
rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 4 months ago
To Ponzi schemes and selling snake oil. Only their customers won’t complain and sue them, because it’s still sometimes nice to use, and it’s a real functioning thing, and premium costs are not deceit, and nobody wants to admit they’ve been fooled, and they are often not qualified to understand it.
redcalcium@lemmy.institute 4 months ago
Weren’t Microsoft got fined similar amount (or was it higher) for Internet Explorer browser monopoly back then?
maryjayjay@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Yes. And they were allowed to pay that fine in the form of free copies of Windows to schools. Our justice system at work, people! 😔