Google will no longer back up the Internet: Cached webpages are dead

Comments

• Zevlen@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Can someone explain to me if this is a bad or good thing please? 🥺

  source

  • can@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Bad. Having google archive a page every time in indexed was handy.

    source

    • RyeMan@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      So handy and for so many different reasons. Sometimes what you needed was specifically on that one webpage and sometimes for whatever reason you just can’t access that website. In those cases the cached feature was usually the only way to access the content.

      source
• Fleur__@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I must now screenshot every picture of a cute boy I see lest they vanish forever :(

  source
• Enkers@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  While this sucks, it’s yet another death knell for Google. Their main product is so ad-ridden it’s nearly unusable now anyways. If you haven’t jumped ship, there’s no better time than now. I’m personally using searx now, as it’s an open source project, and has quite a few instances to choose from.

  source
• autotldr@lemmings.world [bot] ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  This is the best summary I could come up with:

  ---

  Google Search’s “cached” links have long been an alternative way to load a website that was down or had changed, but now the company is killing them off.

  The feature has been appearing and disappearing for some people since December, and currently, we don’t see any cache links in Google Search.

  Cached links used to live under the drop-down menu next to every search result on Google’s page.

  As the Google web crawler scoured the Internet for new and updated webpages, it would also save a copy of whatever it was seeing.

  That quickly led to Google having a backup of basically the entire Internet, using what was probably an uncountable number of petabytes of data.

  In 2020, Google switched to mobile-by-default, so for instance, if you visit that cached Ars link from earlier, you get the mobile site.

  ---

  The original article contains 438 words, the summary contains 139 words. Saved 68%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  source