I guess it’s pretty cheap to run stealth ads like this on lemmy, since you only need like 20 up votes to get on everyone’s front page.
Real Talk: Why Is Datadog So Expensive?
Submitted 1 year ago by dominiquec@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
https://thenewstack.io/real-talk-why-is-datadog-so-expensive/
Comments
ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
macgyver@federation.red 1 year ago
Have already been contacted to do as much on my instance
ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
You’d think they’d at least try to make it not look like an ad, at least.
DefiantBidet@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Bc when entire infra teams rely on your service to operate, and orgs depend on infra, you can charge for that service bc orgs have to pay it, or degrade to cheaper, less robust alternatives - which do exist
linearchaos@lemmy.world 1 year ago
They’re pretty good, they’re better, but they’re not that much better than Splunk or Elasticsearch (especially the value with Elasticsearch community) I admit elasticsearch gets pricey if you go corporate.
But Splunk, they’re like 80% of the product at 20% of the price
squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world 1 year ago
New Relic is better. Datadog sucks by comparison.
baggins@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
What’s data dog?
aapepinspace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
A monitoring service for IT systems. It uses an agent that is installed on servers or as a container, that sends metrics and/or logs to Datadog’s platform. You can then set up dashboards, notifications and alerting in their webgui.
grayman@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The latest shit to drain your budget since splunk jacked up their price again.
ghostface@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Because data is valuable
knobbysideup@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Naemon + Graylog work for us.
WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social 1 year ago
T4UTV1S@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I just read the article, it’s actually pretty interesting.
The TL;DR is that there is so much observable data out there (exponentially more than expected), that Datadog, which isn’t optimized to deal with that, caused their prices to need to hike.
There are two options listed as alternatives:
- Self host but it might not be cheaper
- Buy into a company that is from the ground up focusing on dealing with that massive amount of data.
ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
You mean you just read this advertisement?
Then made a comment that sure looks like a 2nd advertisement for it?
I hear Splunk is nice. I don’t see them having to place thinly veiled advertisements on social media.
T4UTV1S@lemmy.world 1 year ago
All due respect (which is none), I don’t give a fuck what you think. Plus, this isn’t even an ad for Splunk, which you’d know if you actually read the article.
DefiantBidet@lemmy.world 1 year ago
its an incredibly powerful tool. I’ve seen its usage bloom from simple box health to actually determining cost per month of services. basically going from a “hows it looking” to a “we need this tool to achieve our margins”
linearchaos@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I always figured it was because they have to pay the 27 reps that call and email me monthly begging to set up a meeting because I looked up their service once several years ago and asked for pricing.
There’s so much more expensive than the alternatives I really had no choice.
Oh, you went with Splunk, I see. Well, can I get a meeting with you to explain why we’re so much better and you would be much happier with us.
No, I’m not going to reinitiate this working completed project and pay three times more for my data munging.
DoomBot5@lemmy.world 1 year ago
To be fair, am currently using both tools. DD is so much nicer to use than splunk.