Why the f#ck do they still need to clarify it was once a good site . X remember I used to be Twitter.
X is a confusing name, and news articles want to write clear content. That is all.
Submitted 11 months ago by Stanwich@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
Why the f#ck do they still need to clarify it was once a good site . X remember I used to be Twitter.
X is a confusing name, and news articles want to write clear content. That is all.
Just more of a middle aged man being an edgelord.
Because “X” means X.org for about 40 years now.
Even down to the logo, same thicker bar on the X.
Has X.org taken any legal action about this? Or can they? I mean it's a letter, though the stylization is practically identical.
Because “X” is ambiguous and basically meaningless. They are clarifying that they are talking about the company that used to be Twitter instead of any of the other 1,000,000 things called X.
For me Twitter died shortly after Musk took over. It’s fitting that he renamed it.
Sir, this is a Wendy’s !technology
It’s an invasion. Severe aggression from Mildly Infuriating.
I believe it was about the time that musk threw a fit the news was still calling it Twitter and threatened to take action. I’m pretty sure they’re calling it that now just to piss him off
They’ve been writing “X, formerly Twitter” in news articles since the day he announced it. Also was “Twitter, currently rebranding to X” for the first week.
Can’t wait for Twitter (formally X (formally Twitter)) to come.
In Finnish media they’re usually calling it “viestipalvelu X” roughly translating to “messaging service X” but it’s not uncommon for them to include that it used to be called twitter.
At least “Twitter” can be blocked nice and easily, “X” is pretty damn tricky without catching stuff like Xylophones, Exercise, Xbox etc
BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 11 months ago