Tesla wins first U.S. Autopilot trial involving fatal crash::Tesla won the first U.S. trial over allegations that its Autopilot driver assistant feature led to a death, a major victory as it faces several other lawsuits.
Such a crap use of logic/words to try and escape culpability.
“We said the driver has to be 100% attentive! So if the car swerves suddenly and crashes it’s the drivers fault, they should have paid attention!” Jesus, if that’s honestly your defence then you have no understanding of the real world
Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 7 months ago
The highlights:
“The case that concluded on Tuesday, in a California state court, was filed by two passengers in a 2019 crash who accused the company of knowing Autopilot was defective when it sold the car. Tesla argued human error caused the crash.
The 12-member jury announced they found the vehicle did not have a manufacturing defect. The verdict came on the fourth day of deliberations, and the vote was 9-3.
The civil lawsuit filed in Riverside County Superior Court alleged the Autopilot system caused owner Micah Lee’s Model 3 to suddenly veer off a highway east of Los Angeles at 65 miles per hour (105 km per hour), strike a palm tree and burst into flames, all in the span of seconds.
The 2019 crash killed Lee and seriously injured his two passengers, including a then-8-year-old boy who was disemboweled, court documents show. The trial involved gruesome testimony about the passengers’ injuries, and the plaintiffs asked the jury for $400 million plus punitive damages.
Tesla denied liability, saying Lee consumed alcohol before getting behind the wheel. The electric-vehicle maker also argued it was unclear whether Autopilot was engaged at the time of the crash.
In [other Tesla autopilot] lawsuits, plaintiffs allege Autopilot is defectively designed, leading drivers to misuse the system. The jury in Riverside, however, was only asked to evaluate whether a manufacturing defect impacted the steering.”
Tosti@feddit.nl 7 months ago
meco03211@lemmy.world 7 months ago
One source says his BAC was 0.05%. California’s legal limit is 0.08%. That doesn’t exclude it from being a factor, just pointing out the guy wasn’t blitzed out of his mind or anything.
The part about being unclear if AP was engaged is quite suspect though, given they have been able to definitively say in other crashes whether it was on or off and even if it had been disengaged moments prior to the accident.
Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 7 months ago
Pure speculation, but I’m guessing the wreck + vehicle fire may have destroyed any computers/logs.
Assuming that there’s an actual valid reason that it’s unclear whether the vehicle was in autopilot or not.
lemann@lemmy.one 7 months ago
Good human ❤️
helenslunch@feddit.nl 7 months ago
Tesla will win the rest also. The only “defect” I can think of is if it failed to disengage when driver input was detected.
The only guy in the car died, so what makes the complainants think that it was even engaged or especially that it failed?
This just reeks of family members looking for an opportunity to exploit their loss for a payday.
DingoBilly@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Just remember your own anecdotal experience does not signify what is the truth. Your statement that Tesla will win the rest is very clearly biased.
As an example, I’ve never been hit by a car while cycling to work. Does that mean cycling to work is 100% safe? Clearly not, but from my viewpoint it is.
PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 7 months ago
Still a good thing to test shit in court, no?