I’m not sure this can legitimately be called green energy.
Submitted 3 weeks ago by compostgoblin@piefed.blahaj.zone to energy@slrpnk.net
Comments
rhythmisaprancer@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
If the alternative is to power the datacentres with gas turbines, I would say that PV+BESS is pretty green.
rhythmisaprancer@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
Sure, but using more sustainable options to provide power to increase consumption is the overarching point to me. Maybe this is less bad, but I don’t view it as pretty green in comparison.
Dippy@beehaw.org 3 weeks ago
The additionallity of it does point towards yes. And, while I am no fan of data centers, they still benefit the renewable energy learning curve. For those unaware, for everytime we double the number of solar panels produced in the world, the cost falls roughly 20% per watt. If Jeff Bezos bought a billion panels and threw them away, it would still result in solar panels being cheaper down the line
cravl@slrpnk.net 2 weeks ago
Plus, if the demand for these AI datacenters were to suddenly decline, utilities could probably buy the excess energy. Or just buy fields outright. It’s public benefit from private up-front investment. Not the worst path to get to the desired outcome.
compostgoblin@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
Oh yeah, I didn’t post this to imply it’s a good thing, just relevant to the discussion of clean energy
TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
boom? no one wants them.
compostgoblin@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
Residents don’t want them, but tech companies definitely do.
reddig33@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I’m actually fine with them building their own power grids. It means they aren’t getting volume discounts from my local electric company and making the power costs go up for the rest of us.