They didn’t even explain which method of services connection they went for. Affixed portion of house in middle or the fancy coupling method?
From an energy use perspective I’m certain that 350k would have been far better spent on passivhous certification than this.
givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 days ago
They keep saying that, but logically it doesn’t make sense…
With energy efficient windows, you’re not getting much free heat/cooling even if you were constantly rotating for optimal position.
And with the $350k price tag, even with 50% savings you’d have to reach 350k paid just to break even.
This is a rich person’s waste of money and they’re back rationalizing why the waste of resources is worth it.
ozeng@aus.social 4 days ago
@givesomefucks @zero_gravitas my BS meter is off the charts too.
Extra cost is $150k. If you save 20kWh per day of energy (which is A LOT) at the current market rate of around 35c/kWh it’ll take you 58 years to recoup the extra build cost.
givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Someone who actually did it recently:
The guy who’s 26 year old plans were used:
This is a case of an elderly person drastically underestimating inflation of housing construction…
It costs 350k
AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 4 days ago
True, though if you have the money to spend on expensive superfluities, building something novel and cool is arguably a better use of it than just spending it on luxury goods.
givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Actually the opposite.
Taking up contractors time on this stuff means less making affordable housing which makes housing less affordable for everyone else.
In general.its happening to our entire economies. Only the wealthiest can afford things, so man hours and resources go into a small amount of luxury products rather than what the masses need.
Raising the prices at all.price points.