Submitted 2 days ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to technology@lemmy.zip
I traced $2 billion in nonprofit grants and 45 states of lobbying records to figure out who’s behind the age verification bills. The answer involves a company that profits from your data writing laws that collect more of it.
This was written by an LLM, wasn’t it?
To all the people saying “but have you checked if it’s wrong”, think about what that implies. Someone can generate way more garbage using an LLM than you can verify. If we need to check it all first, before dismissing it, that means we need to just accept all LLM garbage, because it’s practically impossible to check it all. No, it should be dismissed first, and someone can check it to tell if it’s accurate. I don’t care that it supports your biases. This is much larger than that.
See Methodology and Tools: tboteproject.com/git/hekate/attestation-findings
Looks like I was right. Why repost this? I don’t believe this was ever truly reviewed by a human and Lemmy users won’t do it since most won’t read past the headline.
This was a really interesting read, thanks for sharing! I dislike Meta and lobbyism even more now
This was written by LLM and none of the sources were verified by a human. So, it cannot be trusted.
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 2 days ago
I don’t trust Claude better than any other LLM. The technology itself is evil.