Submitted 1 year ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to technology@lemmy.world
https://www.engadget.com/the-web-version-of-threads-is-finally-here-174909701.html
if you’ve been impatiently refreshing threads.net in your browser waiting for Thread son the web to be available, you should check again as access seems to have been greatly expanded..
but the new features coming out could entice those early adopters to take a peek and become active users.
doubt
Howdya do that font/markup? Is that code
I really like the design of the login page, will I try the service? Nope.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
After announcing that its Twitter competitor would be accessible from browsers earlier this week, Meta’s rollout is finally underway.
Instagram head Adam Mosseri confirmed Thursday the update is now live for all users.
Though it was possible to manually navigate to a specific user’s profile, people have been unable to browse their feeds, post, reply or even log in to their accounts from browsers.
Now that the web version is finally live, it will be interesting to see which of the many “missing” features Threads will get next.
Mosseri has said he’s reluctant to add another inbox to user’s lives, though he recently raised the possibility of incorporating Instagram DMs into the Threads experience.
But he did confirm that post-editing features are in the works, so at least Threads users won’t have to wait more than a decade for an edit button.
The original article contains 296 words, the summary contains 142 words. Saved 52%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
I wouldn’t mind trying out Threads…
If the sign up process wasn’t so difficult. It shouldn’t be a country club.
Geert@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I don’t understand why this news is downvoted. Yes Threads sucks but it is news and relevant