In reviewing the Fedipact page, I noticed the message about Threads having moved to threads.com nearly a year ago. In reviewing federation status with the Federation Checker tool, I noticed that most Lemmy instances don’t appear to have added threads.com to their defederation lists. Is Threads able to federate with other Fediverse instances using its new domain?
Yes, as long as it’s not blocked, it can federate just like any other software.
rimu@piefed.social 9 hours ago
It doesn’t matter, Threads has crippled their ActivityPub implementation so badly that I’ve never once seen a post from a threads user. Meta gave up on the idea, effectively.
supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 58 minutes ago
Pikachuface.jpg
Ulrich@feddit.org 8 hours ago
I don’t know that they crippled anything. I still regularly see posts from a few users. The problem is that they just half-assed it. It’s unidirectional. So you can see and reply to their posts but they can’t do anything back. They can’t follow you or reply to anything. It’s also opt-in, and almost no one cared enough to do that.
hector@lemmy.today 3 hours ago
That is definitely it, they made it technically possible to say they are competitive and not a trust, and then sabotaged it so it’s actually not workable. As our regulators and courts are captured that obvious slight of hand is enough of an excuse for the authorities to pretend to believe them.
JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
From their perspective: not enough users to be worth the bother.
4am@lemmy.zip 6 hours ago
Why federate when you can just scrape and avoid the controversy